From: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:43:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301141743.25513.efocht@ess.nec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301141723.29613.efocht@ess.nec.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 581 bytes --]
Aargh, I should have gone home earlier...
For those who really care about patch 05, it's attached. It's all
untested as I don't have a ia32 NUMA machine running 2.5.58...
Erich
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 17:23, Erich Focht wrote:
> In the previous email the patch 02-initial-lb-2.5.58.patch had a bug
> and this was present in the numa-sched-2.5.58.patch and
> numa-sched-add-2.5.58.patch, too. Please use the patches attached to
> this email! Sorry for the silly mistake...
>
> Christoph, I used your way of coding nr_running_inc/dec now.
>
> Regards,
> Erich
[-- Attachment #2: 05-var-intnode-lb-2.5.58.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2949 bytes --]
diff -urNp 2.5.58-ms-ilb-nb-sm/kernel/sched.c 2.5.58-ms-ilb-nb-sm-var/kernel/sched.c
--- 2.5.58-ms-ilb-nb-sm/kernel/sched.c 2003-01-14 17:11:48.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.5.58-ms-ilb-nb-sm-var/kernel/sched.c 2003-01-14 17:36:26.000000000 +0100
@@ -67,8 +67,9 @@
#define INTERACTIVE_DELTA 2
#define MAX_SLEEP_AVG (2*HZ)
#define STARVATION_LIMIT (2*HZ)
-#define NODE_BALANCE_RATIO 10
#define NODE_THRESHOLD 125
+#define NODE_BALANCE_MIN 10
+#define NODE_BALANCE_MAX 40
/*
* If a task is 'interactive' then we reinsert it in the active
@@ -186,6 +187,8 @@ static struct runqueue runqueues[NR_CPUS
#if CONFIG_NUMA
static atomic_t node_nr_running[MAX_NUMNODES] ____cacheline_maxaligned_in_smp =
{[0 ...MAX_NUMNODES-1] = ATOMIC_INIT(0)};
+static int internode_lb[MAX_NUMNODES] ____cacheline_maxaligned_in_smp =
+ {[0 ...MAX_NUMNODES-1] = NODE_BALANCE_MAX};
static inline void nr_running_inc(runqueue_t *rq)
{
@@ -735,15 +738,18 @@ void sched_balance_exec(void)
static int find_busiest_node(int this_node)
{
int i, node = -1, load, this_load, maxload;
+ int avg_load;
this_load = maxload = (this_rq()->prev_node_load[this_node] >> 1)
+ atomic_read(&node_nr_running[this_node]);
this_rq()->prev_node_load[this_node] = this_load;
+ avg_load = this_load;
for (i = 0; i < numnodes; i++) {
if (i == this_node)
continue;
load = (this_rq()->prev_node_load[i] >> 1)
+ atomic_read(&node_nr_running[i]);
+ avg_load += load;
this_rq()->prev_node_load[i] = load;
if (load > maxload &&
(100*load > ((NODE_THRESHOLD*100*this_load)/100))) {
@@ -751,10 +757,26 @@ static int find_busiest_node(int this_no
node = i;
}
}
- if (maxload <= 4+2+1)
+ avg_load = avg_load / (numnodes ? numnodes : 1);
+ if (this_load < (avg_load / 2)) {
+ if (internode_lb[this_node] == NODE_BALANCE_MAX)
+ internode_lb[this_node] = NODE_BALANCE_MIN;
+ } else
+ if (internode_lb[this_node] == NODE_BALANCE_MIN)
+ internode_lb[this_node] = NODE_BALANCE_MAX;
+ if (maxload <= 4+2+1 || this_load >= avg_load)
node = -1;
return node;
}
+
+static inline int remote_steal_factor(runqueue_t *rq)
+{
+ int cpu = __cpu_to_node(task_cpu(rq->curr));
+
+ return (cpu == __cpu_to_node(smp_processor_id())) ? 1 : 2;
+}
+#else
+#define remote_steal_factor(rq) 1
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
#if CONFIG_SMP
@@ -903,7 +925,7 @@ static void load_balance(runqueue_t *thi
/*
* Avoid rebalancing between nodes too often.
*/
- if (!(++(this_rq->nr_balanced) % NODE_BALANCE_RATIO)) {
+ if (!(++(this_rq->nr_balanced) % internode_lb[this_node])) {
int node = find_busiest_node(this_node);
if (node >= 0)
cpumask = __node_to_cpu_mask(node) | (1UL << this_cpu);
@@ -967,7 +989,7 @@ skip_queue:
goto skip_bitmap;
}
pull_task(busiest, array, tmp, this_rq, this_cpu);
- if (!idle && --imbalance) {
+ if (!idle && ((--imbalance)/remote_steal_factor(busiest))) {
if (curr != head)
goto skip_queue;
idx++;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-14 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-09 23:54 Minature NUMA scheduler Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-10 5:36 ` [Lse-tech] " Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-10 16:34 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-10 16:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-12 23:35 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-12 23:55 ` NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Erich Focht
2003-01-13 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-01-13 11:32 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-13 15:26 ` [Lse-tech] " Christoph Hellwig
2003-01-13 15:46 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-13 19:03 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-14 1:23 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-14 4:45 ` [Lse-tech] " Andrew Theurer
2003-01-14 4:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-14 11:14 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler Erich Focht
2003-01-14 16:07 ` [Lse-tech] " Christoph Hellwig
2003-01-14 16:23 ` [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Erich Focht
2003-01-14 16:43 ` Erich Focht [this message]
2003-01-14 19:02 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-14 21:56 ` [Lse-tech] " Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-15 15:10 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-16 0:14 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-16 6:05 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-16 16:47 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-16 18:07 ` Robert Love
2003-01-16 18:48 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-16 19:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-16 18:59 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-16 19:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-01-16 19:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-16 19:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-16 20:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-16 20:29 ` [Lse-tech] " Rick Lindsley
2003-01-16 23:31 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-17 7:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-17 8:47 ` [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Ingo Molnar
2003-01-17 14:35 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-17 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-17 15:30 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-17 16:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-18 20:54 ` NUMA sched -> pooling scheduler (inc HT) Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-18 21:34 ` [Lse-tech] " Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-19 0:13 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-01-17 18:19 ` [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-18 7:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-18 8:12 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-18 8:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19 4:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-17 17:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-17 17:23 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-17 18:11 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-17 19:04 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-17 19:26 ` [Lse-tech] " Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-18 0:13 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-18 13:31 ` [patch] tunable rebalance rates for sched-2.5.59-B0 Erich Focht
2003-01-18 23:09 ` [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Erich Focht
2003-01-20 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-20 12:07 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-20 16:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-20 17:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-20 17:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-20 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-20 19:13 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-01-20 19:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-20 19:52 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-01-20 19:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-20 21:18 ` [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-D7 Ingo Molnar
2003-01-20 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-21 1:11 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-22 3:15 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-22 16:41 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-01-22 16:17 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-22 16:20 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-01-22 16:35 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-02-03 18:23 ` [patch] HT scheduler, sched-2.5.59-E2 Ingo Molnar
2003-02-03 20:47 ` Robert Love
2003-02-04 9:31 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-20 17:04 ` [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-21 17:44 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-20 16:23 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-20 16:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-17 23:09 ` Matthew Dobson
2003-01-16 23:45 ` [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-17 11:10 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-17 14:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-01-16 19:44 ` John Bradford
2003-01-14 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-01-15 0:05 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-15 7:47 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-14 5:50 ` [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-14 16:52 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-01-14 15:13 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-14 10:56 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-11 14:43 ` [Lse-tech] Minature NUMA scheduler Bill Davidsen
2003-01-12 23:24 ` Erich Focht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200301141743.25513.efocht@ess.nec.de \
--to=efocht@ess.nec.de \
--cc=habanero@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox