From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:04:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:04:51 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:11784 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:04:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:13:41 +0000 From: Russell King To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: TTY subsystem maintainership Message-ID: <20030114231341.D4077@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Before anyone gets any smart ideas, I'd like to make the following point completely crystal clear. I am _not_ repeat _not_ going to take over maintainership for the TTY subsystem. I have too much other stuff to look after to take on that job. However, I will review patches to the TTY layer from time to time, and provide (hopefully) useful feedback. The patches I review will be decided by myself, and will depend on what they touch, how complex they are and how busy I am. And, just for completeness of the message, please do not send TTY layer, TTY line discipline layer, nor random TTY driver patches to me either. Thanks. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html