* [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58
@ 2003-01-15 23:24 Greg KH
2003-01-16 20:14 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2003-01-15 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds; +Cc: linux-usb-devel, linux-kernel
Please pull from: bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/linus-2.5
thanks,
greg k-h
MAINTAINERS | 6 ++---
drivers/usb/class/bluetty.c | 7 ------
drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c | 4 ---
drivers/usb/core/hcd.c | 2 -
drivers/usb/core/hcd.h | 3 --
drivers/usb/core/usb.c | 1
drivers/usb/misc/speedtouch.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/usb/serial/bus.c | 13 +++++++++++
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c | 1
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 6 ++++-
include/linux/usb.h | 4 ++-
11 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
-----
ChangeSet@1.942, 2003-01-15 14:50:56-08:00, greg@kroah.com
USB: added .owner for USB drivers that have a struct tty_driver
drivers/usb/class/bluetty.c | 7 +------
drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c | 4 +---
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
------
ChangeSet@1.879.84.7, 2003-01-15 13:23:54-08:00, baldrick@wanadoo.fr
[PATCH] USB: SpeedTouch not Speed Touch
speedtouch: use SpeedTouch everywhere (was sometimes Speed Touch).
drivers/usb/misc/speedtouch.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
------
ChangeSet@1.879.84.6, 2003-01-15 13:23:22-08:00, baldrick@wanadoo.fr
[PATCH] USB: make more speedtouch functions static
speedtouch: make more functions static.
drivers/usb/misc/speedtouch.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
------
ChangeSet@1.879.84.5, 2003-01-15 13:22:47-08:00, baldrick@wanadoo.fr
[PATCH] USB: kill speedtouch tasklet when shutdown
speedtouch: kill receive queue tasklet on shutdown (race pointed
out by Oliver Neukum).
drivers/usb/misc/speedtouch.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
------
ChangeSet@1.879.84.4, 2003-01-15 13:22:21-08:00, david-b@pacbell.net
[PATCH] maintain hcd_dev queue in FIFO order
Current uses of the urb_list have all been to make
sure we have some list of pending urbs, so we can
clean them all up after HCs die, and avoid trying
to unlink something that's not actually linked.
So order hasn't mattered.
This makes the order be FIFO, which is more useful
for other purposes. Like being the HCD's internal
schedule, or dumping for debug.
drivers/usb/core/hcd.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
------
ChangeSet@1.879.84.3, 2003-01-15 12:48:26-08:00, henning@meier-geinitz.de
[PATCH] Change maintainership of USB scanner driver
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
------
ChangeSet@1.879.84.2, 2003-01-14 17:49:55-08:00, greg@kroah.com
[PATCH] USB: add dev attribute for usb-serial devices in sysfs
drivers/usb/serial/bus.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
------
ChangeSet@1.879.76.2, 2003-01-13 17:31:46-08:00, greg@kroah.com
[PATCH] USB: put the usb storage's SCSI device in the proper place in sysfs.
Also makes usb_ifnum_to_if() a public function
drivers/usb/core/hcd.h | 3 ---
drivers/usb/core/usb.c | 1 +
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 5 ++++-
include/linux/usb.h | 4 +++-
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
------
ChangeSet@1.879.76.1, 2003-01-13 17:25:34-08:00, patmans@us.ibm.com
[PATCH] USB storage sysfs fix
It looks like there is a missing scsi_set_device() call in scsiglue.c,
(similiar to what happens if we handled NULL dev pointer in scis_add_host)
so all the usb scsi devices end up under /sysfs/devices.
I don't have any usb mass storage devices, this patch against 2.5 bk
compiles but otherwise is not tested. It should put the usb-scsi mass
storage devices below the usb sysfs dev (I assume in your case under
/sysfs/devices/pci0/00:07.2/usb1/1-2/1-2.4/1-2.4.4).
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58
2003-01-15 23:24 [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58 Greg KH
@ 2003-01-16 20:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-16 20:25 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2003-01-16 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-usb-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Greg KH wrote:
Would it be possible to post patches in general instead of pointing to bk:
links? Some people can't use bk and would like the patches (legal opinion,
not technical issues).
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58
2003-01-16 20:14 ` Bill Davidsen
@ 2003-01-16 20:25 ` Greg KH
2003-01-17 14:43 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2003-01-16 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bill Davidsen; +Cc: linux-usb-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:14:39PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to post patches in general instead of pointing to bk:
> links? Some people can't use bk and would like the patches (legal opinion,
> not technical issues).
All usb patches that are sent to Marcelo and Linus are posted to the
linux-usb-devel mailing list as responses to the BK posting. I'm not
sending them to lkml as that would just be annoying to the 99% of the
people on there.
I also put the patches sent in patch form in the:
kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/usb/...
directories.
Is that sufficient for those not willing/able to use bk?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58
2003-01-16 20:25 ` Greg KH
@ 2003-01-17 14:43 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2003-01-17 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-usb-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:14:39PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible to post patches in general instead of pointing to bk:
> > links? Some people can't use bk and would like the patches (legal opinion,
> > not technical issues).
>
> All usb patches that are sent to Marcelo and Linus are posted to the
> linux-usb-devel mailing list as responses to the BK posting. I'm not
> sending them to lkml as that would just be annoying to the 99% of the
> people on there.
>
> I also put the patches sent in patch form in the:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/usb/...
> directories.
>
> Is that sufficient for those not willing/able to use bk?
Yes, very. I missed the patch location, I don't follow the usb-devel list.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-17 14:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-15 23:24 [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58 Greg KH
2003-01-16 20:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-16 20:25 ` Greg KH
2003-01-17 14:43 ` Bill Davidsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox