From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:16:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:16:47 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:2320 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:16:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:25:06 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Bill Davidsen Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58 Message-ID: <20030116202506.GF32697@kroah.com> References: <20030115232434.GD25816@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:14:39PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Greg KH wrote: > > Would it be possible to post patches in general instead of pointing to bk: > links? Some people can't use bk and would like the patches (legal opinion, > not technical issues). All usb patches that are sent to Marcelo and Linus are posted to the linux-usb-devel mailing list as responses to the BK posting. I'm not sending them to lkml as that would just be annoying to the 99% of the people on there. I also put the patches sent in patch form in the: kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/usb/... directories. Is that sufficient for those not willing/able to use bk? thanks, greg k-h