From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:55:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:55:02 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:41445 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:55:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 23:05:06 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, gone@us.ibm.com, akpm@zip.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: asm-i386/mmzone.h macro paren/eval fixes Message-Id: <20030116230506.70fa96f9.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <181070000.1042786246@titus> References: <20030117063900.GA1036@holomorphy.com> <181070000.1042786246@titus> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2003 07:03:52.0962 (UTC) FILETIME=[98014620:01C2BDF6] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Martin J. Bligh" wrote: > > Ugh. That's why I broke struct page out into a seperate header file. > OK, Andrew ... now do you believe me? ;-) ;-) I never disagreed. But the dependency chain for struct page is pretty long, too. The core problem is the practice of putting things which define stuff in the same header as things which do stuff.