public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
To: <jamie@shareable.org>, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:57:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030118045719.AAA8414@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030118043309.GA18658@bjl1.asuk.net>


	I'm starting to think that one cannot legally use BitKeeper as the 
preferred means of developing a GPLed program. The problem is, the 
GPL defines the source as the preferred base to modify the software 
from and requires you to be able to distribute the source without any 
additional licensing requirements.

	If BitKeeper is the version management tool, then BitKeeper is part 
of the source by this definition. Providing the source in BK form 
without BK is as useless as providing it encrypted. Providing it in 
any other form does not satisfy the GPL (assuming that BK form is in 
fact the preferred way of modifying it).

	DS



  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-18  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-18  4:33 Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18  4:57 ` David Schwartz [this message]
2003-01-18  5:10   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18  7:23     ` David Schwartz
2003-01-18  7:54       ` [OFFTOPIC] Is the repository of a GPL'd program itself under the GPL? Jamie Lokier
2003-01-20  0:50         ` Richard Stallman
2003-01-18  5:02 ` Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Andrew Morton
2003-01-18  5:15   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18  5:29 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-18  6:11   ` Tupshin Harper
2003-01-18  6:20   ` Kevin Puetz
2003-01-18  6:39     ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-18  8:09   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18  8:25     ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-18 14:22   ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-19 18:39     ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-19 18:55       ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-19 21:50       ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-19 23:26         ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-19 23:57           ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20  0:20             ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-20  0:38               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 15:52             ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-20 19:43               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 19:46               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21  7:56                 ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-20 14:18           ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-22 12:24   ` Matthias Andree
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-18  6:22 Jamie Lokier
     [not found] <20030119235742.AAA13049%shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
2003-01-20  0:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-20  1:05   ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 14:28     ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-20 19:00       ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 19:31         ` David Lang
2003-01-20 20:19           ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 20:40             ` John Bradford
2003-01-20 20:48             ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-20 21:14               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 21:58                 ` John Bradford
2003-01-20 21:37               ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-20 21:41             ` Rik van Riel
2003-01-21 16:04         ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-21 18:34           ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21 18:49             ` John Bradford
2003-01-21 18:58             ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-21 19:27             ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-21 21:04               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21 19:51             ` Hua Zhong
2003-01-22  7:10               ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-22  7:21                 ` John Alvord
2003-01-22 15:18                 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-22 15:27                   ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-22 15:38                     ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-20  1:46   ` David Lang
2003-01-20  1:52   ` Andre Hedrick
     [not found] <20030120010504.AAA18836%shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
2003-01-20  1:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-20 15:55 Theodore Ts'o
2003-01-20 18:53 ` David Schwartz
     [not found] <20030120194430.AAA20700%shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
2003-01-20 20:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-20 21:27   ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21  8:51     ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-21  0:28 Cort Dougan
2003-01-21 19:22 Larry McVoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030118045719.AAA8414@shell.webmaster.com@whenever \
    --to=davids@webmaster.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@bitmover.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox