From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:29:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030118052919.GA22751@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030118043309.GA18658@bjl1.asuk.net>
As far as I can tell your complaint is that you can't have access to
the up to minute source view without using something which violates
your politics.
The fact that you can get almost real time views via one of many BK to
tarball/patch mirrors seems to not be good enough.
I guess I don't know how to help you. As far as I can tell, if Linus
wasn't using BK he'd still be doing what he was doing up until he started
using BK which means you wouldn't have the option of the up to date
snapshots you can currently get.
The basis of your complaint seems to be "BK makes some things possible
which weren't possible before, my politics don't let me use BK but I
want the advantages which would come from using BK". I'm sorry, but
I don't know what to do to help you. The part of BK you'd like me to
disclose is something that we consider quite valuable and unique to our
product and we have no intention of disclosing how it works.
I fail to see why this is such a big deal, you now have up to the
hour snapshots in the form you want where before you had to wait weeks
between releases. That's a dramatic improvement over what you had a
year ago and complaining that you can't have up to the minute views of
the source when the only reason is your politics, well, is it going to
seem really unreasonable if I think that maybe your politics are getting
in the way of your technical goals?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-18 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-18 4:33 Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18 4:57 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-18 5:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18 7:23 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-18 7:54 ` [OFFTOPIC] Is the repository of a GPL'd program itself under the GPL? Jamie Lokier
2003-01-20 0:50 ` Richard Stallman
2003-01-18 5:02 ` Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Andrew Morton
2003-01-18 5:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18 5:29 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2003-01-18 6:11 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-01-18 6:20 ` Kevin Puetz
2003-01-18 6:39 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-18 8:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18 8:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-18 14:22 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-19 18:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-19 18:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-19 21:50 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-19 23:26 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-19 23:57 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 0:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-20 0:38 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 15:52 ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-20 19:43 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 19:46 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21 7:56 ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-20 14:18 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-22 12:24 ` Matthias Andree
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-18 6:22 Jamie Lokier
[not found] <20030119235742.AAA13049%shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
2003-01-20 0:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-20 1:05 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 14:28 ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-20 19:00 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 19:31 ` David Lang
2003-01-20 20:19 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 20:40 ` John Bradford
2003-01-20 20:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-20 21:14 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 21:58 ` John Bradford
2003-01-20 21:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-20 21:41 ` Rik van Riel
2003-01-21 16:04 ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-21 18:34 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21 18:49 ` John Bradford
2003-01-21 18:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-21 19:27 ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-21 21:04 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21 19:51 ` Hua Zhong
2003-01-22 7:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-22 7:21 ` John Alvord
2003-01-22 15:18 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-22 15:27 ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-22 15:38 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-20 1:46 ` David Lang
2003-01-20 1:52 ` Andre Hedrick
[not found] <20030120010504.AAA18836%shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
2003-01-20 1:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-20 15:55 Theodore Ts'o
2003-01-20 18:53 ` David Schwartz
[not found] <20030120194430.AAA20700%shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
2003-01-20 20:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-20 21:27 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21 8:51 ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-21 0:28 Cort Dougan
2003-01-21 19:22 Larry McVoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030118052919.GA22751@work.bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox