Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix

Ingo Molnar
2003-01-16T18:54:04Z

On 16 Jan 2003, Robert Love wrote:

> > Fine. This form is also nearer to the codingstyle rule: "functions
> > should do only one thing" (I'm reading those more carefully now ;-)
>
> Good ;)
>
> This is looking good. Thanks hch for going over it with your fine tooth
> comb.
>
> Erich and Martin, what more needs to be done prior to inclusion? Do you
> still want an exec balancer in place?

well, it needs to settle down a bit more, we are technically in a
codefreeze :-)

Ingo