public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.59{-mm2} with contest
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 00:50:49 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301190051.13781.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Contest (http://contest.kolivas.net) benchmarks with the osdl 
(http://www.osdl.org) hardware on 2.5.59 and mm2:

no_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       74      95.9    0       0.0     1.00
2.5.58-mm1      3       74      94.6    0       0.0     1.00
2.5.59          3       74      94.6    0       0.0     1.00
2.5.59-mm2      4       74      95.9    0       0.0     1.00
cacherun:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       73      97.3    0       0.0     0.99
2.5.58-mm1      3       72      97.2    0       0.0     0.97
2.5.59          3       72      97.2    0       0.0     0.97
2.5.59-mm2      3       72      98.6    0       0.0     0.97
process_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       89      79.8    28      16.9    1.20
2.5.58-mm1      3       87      80.5    26      16.1    1.18
2.5.59          3       88      80.7    27      15.9    1.19
2.5.59-mm2      3       89      79.8    29      18.0    1.20
ctar_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       107     82.2    2       6.5     1.45
2.5.58-mm1      3       102     80.4    2       7.8     1.38
2.5.59          3       106     81.1    2       7.5     1.43
2.5.59-mm2      3       97      77.3    1       4.1     1.31
xtar_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       119     78.2    1       5.9     1.61
2.5.58-mm1      3       107     79.4    1       5.6     1.45
2.5.59          3       118     78.0    1       5.9     1.59
2.5.59-mm2      3       99      73.7    1       6.1     1.34
io_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       136     58.8    6       12.4    1.84
2.5.58-mm1      3       138     55.8    7       13.0    1.86
2.5.59          4       113     68.1    4       9.7     1.53
2.5.59-mm2      3       563     12.8    38      17.4    7.61
read_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       96      81.2    6       6.2     1.30
2.5.58-mm1      3       97      79.4    6       6.2     1.31
2.5.59          3       96      79.2    6       6.2     1.30
2.5.59-mm2      3       137     54.7    9       6.6     1.85
list_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       87      83.9    0       8.0     1.18
2.5.58-mm1      3       87      83.9    0       8.0     1.18
2.5.59          3       87      83.9    0       8.0     1.18
2.5.59-mm2      2       87      83.9    0       8.0     1.18
mem_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       97      77.3    46      1.0     1.31
2.5.58-mm1      3       100     73.0    50      1.0     1.35
2.5.59          3       99      74.7    48      1.0     1.34
2.5.59-mm2      3       95      76.8    48      1.0     1.28
dbench_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.58          3       120     63.3    3       21.7    1.62
2.5.58-mm1      3       122     60.7    3       23.8    1.65
2.5.59          3       108     69.4    2       15.7    1.46
2.5.59-mm2      3       120     60.0    3       26.7    1.62

HELLO! Something going on here. Went back and repeated results and looked 
carefully - can't see any funny business going on at my end. Modest changes 
from 2.5.58-59 and big changes with -mm2.

Full details and archived results available at:
http://www.osdl.org/projects/ctdevel/results/
Only results with current version of contest and hardware setup are kept 
there.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+KVu7F6dfvkL3i1gRAkiXAJsHQYc1QWioZRGiap9+6STXcywVtwCdFmOW
oZ/gfmCZTA4C6WZPGYcPToQ=
=vV66
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

             reply	other threads:[~2003-01-18 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-18 13:50 Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-01-18 21:47 ` [BENCHMARK] 2.5.59{-mm2} with contest Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200301190051.13781.conman@kolivas.net \
    --to=conman@kolivas.net \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox