From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@holomorphy.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zwane@linuxpower.ca, zab@zabbo.net,
manfred@colorfullife.com, macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl,
Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com, jamesclv@us.ibm.com,
andrew.grover@intel.com
Subject: Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:55:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030119025514.GD780@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301182114400.24250-100000@montezuma.mastecende.com>
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> +int vector_to_irq[MAX_NUMNODES][FIRST_SYSTEM_VECTOR - FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR + 1];
>> +int apic_pin_to_irq[MAX_IO_APICS][24];
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * timer vectors must always go to 0
>> + * vectors < FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR are 1:1
>> + * everything else goes through the table
>> + */
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:32:22PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Careful.
> NR Log Phy Mask Trig IRR Pol Stat Dest Deli Vect:
> 00 001 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 31
> 01 001 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 39
> 02 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
> 03 001 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 41
> 04 001 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 49
> 05 001 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 51
> 06 001 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 59
> 07 001 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 61
Well, sure, but I can't tell what the software interrupt numbers are
from here. And all of those are above FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR AFAICT.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> +int irq_of_vector(int vector)
>> +{
>> + int irq;
>> + if (vector < FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR)
>> + irq = vector;
>> + else
>> + irq = vector_to_irq[numa_node_id()][vector-FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR];
>> + return irq;
>> +}
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:32:22PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Same as above.
This is translation to software interrupt number; I don't see what the
issue is. do_IRQ() calls this on a raw vector which is the index of the
interrupt gate in the IDT, and I guaranteed that it would be the raw IDT
indexthe case elsewhere in the patch (and this is different from the
vanilla Pee Cee case, and even marked with a #ifdef).
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> +static int __init assign_irq_vector(int irq)
>> +{
>> + static int current_vector = FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR+1;
>> + if (!irq)
>> + return FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR;
>> + else if (!irq_vector[irq]) {
>> + irq_vector[irq] = current_vector;
>> + current_vector = next_irq_vector(current_vector);
>> + }
>> + return irq_vector[irq];
>> +}
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:32:22PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> You'll drop irqs when you have collisions with devices
> attached to other busses/ioapics
Those aren't reachable anyway. Any given IO-APIC can only reach
devices within its own node. The only possible issue is the priority
class bounded-depth queueing issue (max of 2 or 3 pending) which I've
decided to ignore until something closer to working materializes.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> +#define init_vector_to_irq() do {} while (0)
>> +#define set_irq_of_vector(a,v,i) do {} while (0)
>> +#define set_irq_of_pin(a,v,i) do {} while (0)
>> +
>> +int irq_of_vector(int vector) { return vector; }
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:32:22PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> This would need major warnings not to use on non NUMAQ since that
> information is relevant on Walmart SMP.
What on earth? The whole patch _should_ be a no-op on vanilla Pee Cees
(modulo breakage; there is of course minimal testing going on, and doing
it in a way with a much better guarantee of not touching Pee Cee code
_at all_ is going to be needed for 2.5 mergeable stuff). The whole
1:1-ness breaking is handled by wrapping things with no-ops like the
above and then introducing the sudden semantics change, which is (as it
should be) #ifdef'd on NUMA-Q, although the #ifdef's etc. etc. probably
belong elsewhere for anything remotely mergeable.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
>> + set_intr_gate(vector, interrupt[vector]);
>> +#else
>> set_intr_gate(vector, interrupt[irq]);
>> +#endif
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:32:22PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> hmm..
This is the bit about the interrupt gates pushing the vector instead
of the software interrupt number, and then doing the vector -> software
interrupt number translation in do_IRQ() (which qualifies it with the
essential numa_node_id(), provided in the irq_of_vector() function).
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> + if (irq < 0) {
>> + printk("bad vector %ld, irq %d\n", regs.orig_eax & 0xff, irq);
>> + dump_stack();
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> +
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:32:22PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Oh my =)
Well, the issue is still being debugged. I'm asking for help, in my own
sick, twisted way. =)
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-19 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-15 10:58 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-15 11:24 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-01-15 11:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-15 12:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-01-15 13:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-15 15:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-15 15:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19 1:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19 1:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19 2:13 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-01-19 2:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-19 2:32 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-01-19 2:55 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-01-19 3:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-28 5:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-15 17:32 Protasevich, Natalie
2003-01-15 22:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030119025514.GD780@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=zab@zabbo.net \
--cc=zwane@holomorphy.com \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox