From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 02:41:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 02:41:32 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:33418 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 02:41:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:50:30 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Dave Olien , Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, markw@osdl.org, cliffw@osdl.org, maryedie@osdl.org, jenny@osdl.org Subject: Re: [BUG] BUG_ON in I/O scheduler, bugme # 288 Message-ID: <20030124075030.GF910@suse.de> References: <20030123135448.A8801@acpi.pdx.osdl.net> <20030123143824.4aae1efd.akpm@digeo.com> <20030123143453.A9072@acpi.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030123143453.A9072@acpi.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 23 2003, Dave Olien wrote: > > Yup, that should be 2.5.59-mm2. My typo. > > > > I've filed a bug on the OSDL bugme database. You can read it at: > > > > > > http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288 > > > > The title is "2.5.59 and 2.5.50-mm2". I assume it should be 2.5.59-mm2?? > > My test system's down right now. As soon as it comes up, I'll > get onto reproducing it there. I'm assuming vanilla 2.5.59, there's no BUG_ON() in -mm5 that line. -- Jens Axboe