From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 04:37:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 04:37:29 -0500 Received: from albireo.ucw.cz ([81.27.194.19]:10244 "EHLO albireo.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 04:37:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:46:45 +0100 From: Martin Mares To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky , geert@linux-m68k.org, Richard Henderson , "Wiedemeier, Jeff" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2.5] VGA IO on systems with multiple PCI IO domains Message-ID: <20030127094645.GD604@ucw.cz> References: <20030126181326.A799@localhost.park.msu.ru> <20030126214550.GB6873@ucw.cz> <1043624458.2755.37.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1043624458.2755.37.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > What about some kind of ioport_remap() that would take a pci_bus and an > port range as arguments ? If pci_bus is NULL, that would match a > "legacy" ISA bus (non-PCI machine or default ISA bus for machines where > that makes sense). > > What do you think ? Looks good, but maybe we should use some other functions than iob() et al. to do I/O on the remapped addresses. Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth Never make any mistaeks.