* [PATCH] 2.5.59: radeonfb, no visible cursor at the fb console
@ 2003-01-27 22:06 Faik Uygur
2003-01-28 19:05 ` James Simmons
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Faik Uygur @ 2003-01-27 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: jsimmons, andreashappe
This trivial patch fixes the cursor problem at radeonfb.c, reported at
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=292
--- linux-2.5.59-vanilla/drivers/video/radeonfb.c Mon Jan 27 23:25:39 2003
+++ linux-2.5.59/drivers/video/radeonfb.c Mon Jan 27 23:44:02 2003
@@ -2212,6 +2212,7 @@
.fb_copyarea = cfb_copyarea,
.fb_imageblit = cfb_imageblit,
#endif
+ .fb_cursor = soft_cursor,
};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] 2.5.59: radeonfb, no visible cursor at the fb console
2003-01-27 22:06 [PATCH] 2.5.59: radeonfb, no visible cursor at the fb console Faik Uygur
@ 2003-01-28 19:05 ` James Simmons
2003-01-28 20:11 ` Joshua Kwan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Simmons @ 2003-01-28 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Faik Uygur; +Cc: linux-kernel, andreashappe
Applied. Thanks.
> This trivial patch fixes the cursor problem at radeonfb.c, reported at
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=292
>
> --- linux-2.5.59-vanilla/drivers/video/radeonfb.c Mon Jan 27 23:25:39 2003
> +++ linux-2.5.59/drivers/video/radeonfb.c Mon Jan 27 23:44:02 2003
> @@ -2212,6 +2212,7 @@
> .fb_copyarea = cfb_copyarea,
> .fb_imageblit = cfb_imageblit,
> #endif
> + .fb_cursor = soft_cursor,
> };
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] 2.5.59: radeonfb, no visible cursor at the fb console
2003-01-28 19:05 ` James Simmons
@ 2003-01-28 20:11 ` Joshua Kwan
2003-01-28 21:36 ` James Simmons
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Kwan @ 2003-01-28 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Simmons; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 992 bytes --]
Why is this different from the block cursor that is seen in 2.4? (this
one is a '_' type)
Is it a soft cursor and not the hardware one?
-Josh
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:05:34PM +0000, James Simmons wrote:
>
> Applied. Thanks.
>
> > This trivial patch fixes the cursor problem at radeonfb.c, reported at
> > http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=292
> >
> > --- linux-2.5.59-vanilla/drivers/video/radeonfb.c Mon Jan 27 23:25:39 2003
> > +++ linux-2.5.59/drivers/video/radeonfb.c Mon Jan 27 23:44:02 2003
> > @@ -2212,6 +2212,7 @@
> > .fb_copyarea = cfb_copyarea,
> > .fb_imageblit = cfb_imageblit,
> > #endif
> > + .fb_cursor = soft_cursor,
> > };
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] 2.5.59: radeonfb, no visible cursor at the fb console
2003-01-28 20:11 ` Joshua Kwan
@ 2003-01-28 21:36 ` James Simmons
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Simmons @ 2003-01-28 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua Kwan; +Cc: linux-kernel
> Why is this different from the block cursor that is seen in 2.4? (this
> one is a '_' type)
Because '_' is the default cursor for Dec VT100 and VT220 terminals. You
can easily change it via the console layer.
> Is it a soft cursor and not the hardware one?
At present it is a software cursor. There is no hardware cursor support
for the radeon.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-28 21:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-27 22:06 [PATCH] 2.5.59: radeonfb, no visible cursor at the fb console Faik Uygur
2003-01-28 19:05 ` James Simmons
2003-01-28 20:11 ` Joshua Kwan
2003-01-28 21:36 ` James Simmons
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox