From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:13:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:13:27 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:29102 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:13:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:20:01 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Stephan von Krawczynski Cc: Mark Hahn , linux-kernel Subject: Re: no more MTRRs available ? Message-ID: <20030129172001.GM780@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Stephan von Krawczynski , Mark Hahn , linux-kernel References: <20030129162354.55f2ace4.skraw@ithnet.com> <20030129164552.182e0cb8.skraw@ithnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030129164552.182e0cb8.skraw@ithnet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:45:52PM +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > # cat /proc/mtrr > reg00: base=0x00000000 ( 0MB), size=2048MB: write-back, count=1 > reg01: base=0x80000000 (2048MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1 > reg02: base=0xc0000000 (3072MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1 > reg03: base=0xe0000000 (3584MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1 > reg04: base=0xf0000000 (3840MB), size= 128MB: write-back, count=1 > reg05: base=0xf7000000 (3952MB), size= 16MB: uncachable, count=1 > reg06: base=0x100000000 (4096MB), size=4096MB: write-back, count=1 > reg07: base=0x200000000 (8192MB), size=8192MB: write-back, count=1 Looks better than what I'm getting on 2.5.59: curly:~# cat /proc/mtrr reg00: base=0xc0000000 (49152MB), size=16384MB: uncachable, count=1 reg01: base=0x00000000 ( 0MB), size=524288MB: write-back, count=1 reg02: base=0x800000000 (524288MB), size=262144MB: write-back, count=1 Yes, this is standard ia32 (P-III/Coppermine cpus), and hence the numbers here are utter garbage. -- wli