From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: Konrad Eisele <eiselekd@web.de>
Cc: PeteZaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, leon_sparc@groups1.vip.scd.yahoo.com,
dfoulds@pacbell.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding sparc-leon linux to sourcetree
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:44:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030130134402.A12226@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301301353.h0UDrxO24129@mailgate5.cinetic.de>; from eiselekd@web.de on Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:53:59PM +0100
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:53:59 +0100
> From: Konrad Eisele <eiselekd@web.de>
> I would like to ask if it would be possible to add arch/sparc-leon as
> a new architecture to the sourcetree of linux. From 16.12.02 to 16.3.03
> I'm employed at the University and by Jiri Gaisler's Gaisler Reasearch
> to add the MMU that I made as a diploma thesis to the official Leon
> distiribution (the open source sparc chip). [...]
I think it is a worthy goal to have a generic Linux for a generic
LEON, but before I support this particular project, I would like to
discuss one thing.
Your VHDL target must be in use by someone long term.
I do not even care if Opencores or whoever accepts it, but there
must be a nonzero user base, now and in the future. I do not want
to add it then to rip it out like AP-1000. For comparison, a recurring
topic on Sparclinux list is a removal of sun4 and even sun4c.
I was ready to support David Foulds' MMU before, but it never
materialized.
> Almost all the source is a copy from the original sparc distribution
> of you what I'm basically doing is to write the bootup initialization
> routines for leon and to throw out the sun hardware stuff.
"Throw out the sun hardware stuff" sounds broken. Look closer
at CONFIG_SUN4. So far I do not see why you need a separate
architecture. Sure, throwing the stuff away helps you to finish
your diploma on time, but then I have to maintain what's left.
> I'm currently adjusting linux for that platform based on linux 2.5.53.
> I do not know exactly when I willl have a first running kernel,
> but when I have one then what should I do get it into the sourcetree?
Discuss early, discuss often. Use Sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
and, perhaps, the Leon list at (bleah!) yahoogroups. Learn
to send patches, and be ready to stay as a patch for a while
(a year or so). I think Jeff Dike's UML is a model of project
management for you (http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/).
He stayed outside AND in close contact while he proved that the
project was viable, then Linus took it.
Good luck and send those patches,
-- Pete
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-30 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200301301353.h0UDrxO24129@mailgate5.cinetic.de>
2003-01-30 18:44 ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2003-01-30 18:55 ` perl (Was: Adding sparc-leon linux to sourcetree) Pete Zaitcev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030130134402.A12226@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=dfoulds@pacbell.net \
--cc=eiselekd@web.de \
--cc=leon_sparc@groups1.vip.scd.yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox