From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Cliff White <cliffw@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OSDL][BENCHMARK] OSDL-DBT-2 - 2.4 vs 2.5 4-way/8-way with vmstat
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:29:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030131132908.47e47cd6.akpm@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301312026.h0VKQwp28398@mail.osdl.org>
Cliff White <cliffw@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> Link information:
>
> The overall results page for the DBT-2 project is at:
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results
>
> direct link to 4 way results page:
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/STP_4way/STP_4way_2.4v2.5.html
>
> direct link to 8 way results page:
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/LKML2/STP_8way_2.4v2.5.html
> direct link to 8way results page
There seem to be quite a lot of mangled links there. For example,
http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/LKML2/STP_8way_2.4v2.5.html#table0
links to
http:////www.osdl/org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/LKML2/c24.html
and
http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/LKML2/c24.html
links to
http://www.osdl/org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/LKML2/data/c24/296/vmstat.out
and when I fix up the latter:
http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/LKML2/data/c24/296/vmstat.out
it isn't there :(
However the numbers at
http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/LKML_dbt2_2.4v2.5_both.html#table0
Seem to be showing increased user time in 2.5, decreased system time. And
zero pgpgin/pgpgout in 2.5, which seems wrong.
I'd really like to see the vmstat traces. Judging by the reduced idle time
in 2.5, this change could be due to more successful page replacement
decisions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-31 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-31 20:26 [OSDL][BENCHMARK] OSDL-DBT-2 - 2.4 vs 2.5 4-way/8-way with vmstat Cliff White
2003-01-31 21:29 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
[not found] <20030131141350.370c287a.akpm@digeo.com>
2003-01-31 22:47 ` Cliff White
2003-01-31 22:57 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030131132908.47e47cd6.akpm@digeo.com \
--to=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=cliffw@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox