public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: greearb@candelatech.com
Cc: john@grabjohn.com, cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com, ahu@ds9a.nl,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: problems achieving decent throughput with latency.
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 00:41:51 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030204.004151.22906189.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E3F7CDA.9020701@candelatech.com>

   From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
   Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 00:42:02 -0800
   
   Am I correct that if I have 10k clients doing their worst tricks, and
   3 * (80k, my default according to the kernel) == 240k, then I have at most
   2.4MB denial of service?  Assuming 60k clients, that is only about 15MB
   of DoS?  If true, that is a fairly small time DoS considering the RAM available
   on today's machines.

Add in the struct sk_buff for each packet as well, which is dependant
upon MSS.  Thus you could make the clients use a super-small MSS to
get more per-packet struct sk_buff overhead.  The list goes on and on.
At least Linux, unlike BSD, makes an attempt to account for the
sk_buff overhead in the limits :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-04  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-02  7:38 problems achieving decent throughput with latency Ben Greear
2003-02-02 11:48 ` bert hubert
2003-02-03  5:14   ` David S. Miller
2003-02-03 15:37     ` Chris Friesen
2003-02-03 16:11       ` John Bradford
2003-02-03 16:19         ` bert hubert
2003-02-03 18:03         ` Ben Greear
2003-02-03 19:18           ` Eric Weigle
2003-02-04  5:19           ` David S. Miller
2003-02-04  7:50             ` Ben Greear
2003-02-04  7:39               ` David S. Miller
2003-02-04  8:42                 ` Ben Greear
2003-02-04  8:41                   ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-02-04  8:51                   ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030204.004151.22906189.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=john@grabjohn.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox