From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:25:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030204122536.GV6915@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162450000.1044342810@[10.10.2.4]>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:13:31PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > I'm afraid it's code generation engine. It is just worse than
> > M$ or Intel's one. It is not easily fixable,
> > GCC folks have tremendous task at hand.
> >
> > I wonder whether some big companies supposedly supporting
> > Linux (e.g. Intel) can help GCC team (for example by giving
> > away some code and/or developer time).
>
> Comparing Intel's compiler vs GCC on Linux would be more interesting.
> Anyone got a copy and some time to burn?
There are already people who have done this, e.g.
http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/intel_comp/intel_gcc_bench2.html
compares g++ and Intel's C++ compiler with C++ code.
> M.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-04 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-03 23:05 gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-03 23:22 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2003-02-03 23:31 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-04 0:43 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-02-04 13:42 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-04 14:20 ` John Bradford
2003-02-04 6:54 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-04 7:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-04 12:25 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2003-02-04 15:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-04 16:27 ` [Lse-tech] " Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-04 17:40 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-04 17:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-04 9:54 ` Bryan Andersen
2003-02-04 15:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-04 19:09 ` Timothy D. Witham
2003-02-04 19:35 ` John Bradford
2003-02-04 19:44 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-04 20:11 ` John Bradford
2003-02-04 20:20 ` John Bradford
2003-02-04 20:45 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-02-04 21:44 ` Timothy D. Witham
2003-02-05 7:15 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-05 10:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-02-05 11:41 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-05 12:20 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-05 13:10 ` [Lse-tech] " Dipankar Sarma
2003-02-05 15:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-04 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-04 21:54 ` John Bradford
2003-02-04 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-04 23:27 ` Timothy D. Witham
2003-02-04 23:21 ` Larry McVoy
2003-02-04 23:42 ` b_adlakha
2003-02-05 0:19 ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-02-04 23:51 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-02-05 1:03 ` Hugo Mills
2003-02-10 22:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 23:28 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-02-04 23:51 ` Eli Carter
2003-02-05 0:27 ` Larry McVoy
2003-02-06 20:42 ` Paul Jakma
2003-02-05 3:03 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-02-05 6:03 ` Mark Mielke
2003-02-07 16:09 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-04 10:57 ` Padraig
2003-02-04 13:11 ` Helge Hafting
2003-02-04 13:29 ` Jörn Engel
2003-02-04 14:05 ` P
2003-02-04 20:36 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-02-04 12:20 ` [Lse-tech] " Dave Jones
2003-02-04 15:50 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-10 12:13 ` Momchil Velikov
2003-02-06 15:42 ` gcc -O2 vs gcc -Os performance Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-06 15:51 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2003-02-06 17:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-06 17:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-06 20:38 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-06 21:32 ` John Bradford
2003-02-06 22:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-06 22:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-06 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-06 23:59 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-06 23:17 ` Roger Larsson
2003-02-06 23:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
[not found] <1044385759.1861.46.camel@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <200302041935.h14JZ69G002675@darkstar.example.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <b1pbt8$2ll$1@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-02-04 22:05 ` gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance Andi Kleen
2003-02-04 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-05 10:04 ` Pavel Janík
2003-02-05 20:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-06 15:00 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-04 22:59 ` Jeff Muizelaar
2003-02-04 23:12 ` b_adlakha
2003-02-05 8:41 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-05 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-05 19:22 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-02-05 19:24 ` John Bradford
2003-02-06 7:02 ` Neil Booth
[not found] ` <courier.3E423112.00007219@softhome.net>
[not found] ` <20030206212218.GA4891@daikokuya.co.uk>
2003-02-07 10:31 ` b_adlakha
2003-02-07 18:46 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-07 21:49 ` Neil Booth
2003-02-10 2:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-02-10 9:19 ` Tomas Szepe
[not found] <120432836@toto.iv>
2003-02-05 2:45 ` Peter Chubb
[not found] <200302052021.h15KLrXv000881@darkstar.example.net>
2003-02-05 20:28 ` b_adlakha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030204122536.GV6915@fs.tum.de \
--to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox