Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c

Matt Reppert
2003-02-06T17:45:36Z

On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:30:50 -0800
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
> What I'd really like to know is if we really need a glibc2.3 image.
> Would the guy who had the segfaults step foward and confirm/deny the
> use of the static image? We haven't had any other problem reports
> related to glibc2.3 so it may be there is no need to do anything but
> kill the static version.

Indeed; I've had time to try the glibc2.2 version, and this seems to
work fine running a quick bk changes. The static version is what was
segfaulting. Sorry for the noise.

Thanks,
Matt