From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andy Pfiffer <andyp@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkcd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
fastboot@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Re: Kexec on 2.5.59 problems ?
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:51:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030211125144.A2355@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m13cmwyppx.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>; from ebiederm@xmission.com on Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:07:06AM -0700
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1270 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:07:06AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andy Pfiffer <andyp@osdl.org> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 03:14, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> > > Surprisingly though, when I tried just a simple
> > > kexec -e today (having loaded the kernel earlier on),
> > > I ran into the following Oops, consistently:
> > >
> > > I'm using kexec-tools-1.8, and this has worked for me
> > > earlier. The test system is a 4way SMP machine.
> > >
> > > Has anyone seen this as well ? (I'd already issued init 1
> > > and unmounted filesystems by this point)
>
> Hmm. Would love to know which cpu this is on...
>
> I think the primary candidate if this only occurs in smp is
> the switch_mm. It may be that modifying the init_mm is not safe,
> or it gets zapped somewhere else.
>
The following patch from Anton Blanchard's WIP kexec tree
for ppc64 seems to fix this for me. It just does a use_mm()
(routine from fs/aio.c) instead of switch_mm().
Andy could you try this out and see if it helps ?
The other change in Anton's tree that we should probably
include uses a separate kexec_mm rather than init_mm
for the mapping.
Regards
Suparna
--
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Labs, India
[-- Attachment #2: kexec-usemm.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 828 bytes --]
diff -u -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5.59/fs/aio.c linux-2.5.59-kexecdump/fs/aio.c
--- linux-2.5.59/fs/aio.c Fri Jan 17 07:52:06 2003
+++ linux-2.5.59-kexecdump/fs/aio.c Tue Feb 11 09:14:25 2003
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@
return ioctx;
}
-static void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
+void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct mm_struct *active_mm = current->active_mm;
atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
--- linux-2.5.59/arch/i386/kernel/machine_kexec.c Thu Feb 6 16:31:14 2003
+++ linux-2.5.59-kexecdump/arch/i386/kernel/machine_kexec.c Tue Feb 11 09:14:05 2003
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@
relocate_new_kernel_t rnk;
/* switch to an mm where the reboot_code_buffer is identity mapped */
- switch_mm(current->active_mm, &init_mm, current, smp_processor_id());
+ extern void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
+ use_mm(&init_mm);
stop_apics();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-11 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3E448745.9040707@mvista.com>
[not found] ` <m1isvuzjj2.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
2003-02-08 20:18 ` Kexec, DMA, and SMP Corey Minyard
2003-02-09 18:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-10 11:14 ` Kexec on 2.5.59 problems ? Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-10 17:09 ` [Fastboot] " Andy Pfiffer
2003-02-10 18:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-11 7:21 ` Suparna Bhattacharya [this message]
2003-02-11 17:04 ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-02-11 23:46 ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-02-12 4:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-12 22:31 ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-02-13 9:50 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-13 15:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-18 10:59 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-18 15:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-10 12:12 ` Kexec, DMA, and SMP Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-10 13:56 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-10 15:07 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-10 15:22 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-10 17:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-11 1:35 ` Kenneth Sumrall
2003-02-11 5:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-11 17:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-02-11 12:55 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-11 13:40 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-11 14:06 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-11 14:40 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-11 15:20 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-12 4:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-12 14:17 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-12 14:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-12 16:06 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-13 11:13 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-02-14 3:13 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 14:20 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-14 18:10 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 18:23 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-14 19:26 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-02-14 19:44 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 20:00 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-15 6:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-16 16:22 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-16 21:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-17 4:26 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-17 7:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-17 17:32 ` Corey Minyard
2003-02-12 4:47 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030211125144.A2355@in.ibm.com \
--to=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andyp@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkcd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox