public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch>
To: Henrik Persson <nix@socialism.nu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: via rhine bug? (timeouts and resets)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:44:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030211154449.GA2252@k3.hellgate.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200302111344.h1BDiMPY067070@sirius.nix.badanka.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 751 bytes --]

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:43:46 +0100, Henrik Persson wrote:
> I know this has been up before, but I couldn't find a solution in the
> archives that would solve my problems.. 

The patch attached below will definitely solve some of the problems
you're seeing (e.g. "excessive collisions" on a switch). Feedback
welcome. As I've explained in previous postings, the current event
handling is pretty broken.

I have nailed down a number of problems even this patch doesn't fix,
but it's kinda hard to build from there, since testing feedback has been
basically zero. Pretty amazing considering how common Rhine hardware
is. I guess I should write code for NUMA or ia64 instead, _they_ have
testers <g>.

You shouldn't need to force full duplex, btw.

Roger

[-- Attachment #2: via-rhine.c-1.15exp1.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8974 bytes --]

--- linux-2.5.52/drivers/net/via-rhine.c.orig	Fri Dec 20 20:13:55 2002
+++ linux-2.5.52/drivers/net/via-rhine.c	Sat Dec 21 21:09:25 2002
@@ -101,11 +101,14 @@
 	LK1.1.15 (jgarzik):
 	- Use new MII lib helper generic_mii_ioctl
 
+	LK1.1.15exp1 (Roger Luethi):
+	- [...]
+
 */
 
 #define DRV_NAME	"via-rhine"
-#define DRV_VERSION	"1.1.15"
-#define DRV_RELDATE	"November-22-2002"
+#define DRV_VERSION	"1.1.15exp1"
+#define DRV_RELDATE	"December-21-2002"
 
 
 /* A few user-configurable values.
@@ -416,29 +419,15 @@ int mmio_verify_registers[] = {
 /* Bits in the interrupt status/mask registers. */
 enum intr_status_bits {
 	IntrRxDone=0x0001, IntrRxErr=0x0004, IntrRxEmpty=0x0020,
-	IntrTxDone=0x0002, IntrTxError=0x0008, IntrTxUnderrun=0x0010,
+	IntrTxDone=0x0002, IntrTxError=0x0008, IntrTxUnderrun=0x0210,
 	IntrPCIErr=0x0040,
-	IntrStatsMax=0x0080, IntrRxEarly=0x0100, IntrMIIChange=0x0200,
+	IntrStatsMax=0x0080, IntrRxEarly=0x0100,
 	IntrRxOverflow=0x0400, IntrRxDropped=0x0800, IntrRxNoBuf=0x1000,
 	IntrTxAborted=0x2000, IntrLinkChange=0x4000,
 	IntrRxWakeUp=0x8000,
 	IntrNormalSummary=0x0003, IntrAbnormalSummary=0xC260,
 };
 
-/* MII interface, status flags.
-   Not to be confused with the MIIStatus register ... */
-enum mii_status_bits {
-	MIICap100T4			= 0x8000,
-	MIICap10100HdFd		= 0x7800,
-	MIIPreambleSupr		= 0x0040,
-	MIIAutoNegCompleted	= 0x0020,
-	MIIRemoteFault		= 0x0010,
-	MIICapAutoNeg		= 0x0008,
-	MIILink				= 0x0004,
-	MIIJabber			= 0x0002,
-	MIIExtended			= 0x0001
-};
-
 /* The Rx and Tx buffer descriptors. */
 struct rx_desc {
 	s32 rx_status;
@@ -533,30 +522,31 @@ static void via_rhine_set_rx_mode(struct
 static struct net_device_stats *via_rhine_get_stats(struct net_device *dev);
 static int netdev_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd);
 static int  via_rhine_close(struct net_device *dev);
-static inline void clear_tally_counters(long ioaddr);
-static inline void via_restart_tx(struct net_device *dev);
 
 static void wait_for_reset(struct net_device *dev, int chip_id, char *name)
 {
 	long ioaddr = dev->base_addr;
-	int i;
+
+	udelay(5);
+
+	if (readw(ioaddr + ChipCmd) & CmdReset) {
+		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Reset did not complete in 5 us.\n", name);
+	}
 
 	/* VT86C100A may need long delay after reset (dlink) */
 	if (chip_id == VT86C100A)
 		udelay(100);
 
-	i = 0;
-	do {
-		udelay(5);
-		i++;
-		if(i > 2000) {
-			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: reset did not complete in 10 ms.\n", name);
-			break;
-		}
-	} while(readw(ioaddr + ChipCmd) & CmdReset);
+	/* The VT6102 needs to be forced sometimes */
+	if (chip_id == VT6102) {
+		writeb(0x40, ioaddr + 0x81);
+	}
+
+	udelay(5);
+
 	if (debug > 1)
-		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: reset finished after %d microseconds.\n",
-			   name, 5*i);
+		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Reset %s.\n", name,
+			(readw(ioaddr + ChipCmd) & CmdReset) ? "failed" : "succeeded");
 }
 
 #ifdef USE_MEM
@@ -787,17 +777,17 @@ static int __devinit via_rhine_init_one 
 		int phy, phy_idx = 0;
 		np->phys[0] = 1;		/* Standard for this chip. */
 		for (phy = 1; phy < 32 && phy_idx < MAX_MII_CNT; phy++) {
-			int mii_status = mdio_read(dev, phy, 1);
+			int mii_status = mdio_read(dev, phy, MII_BMSR);
 			if (mii_status != 0xffff  &&  mii_status != 0x0000) {
 				np->phys[phy_idx++] = phy;
-				np->mii_if.advertising = mdio_read(dev, phy, 4);
+				np->mii_if.advertising = mdio_read(dev, phy, MII_ADVERTISE);
 				printk(KERN_INFO "%s: MII PHY found at address %d, status "
 					   "0x%4.4x advertising %4.4x Link %4.4x.\n",
 					   dev->name, phy, mii_status, np->mii_if.advertising,
-					   mdio_read(dev, phy, 5));
+					   mdio_read(dev, phy, MII_LPA));
 
 				/* set IFF_RUNNING */
-				if (mii_status & MIILink)
+				if (mii_status & BMSR_LSTATUS)
 					netif_carrier_on(dev);
 				else
 					netif_carrier_off(dev);
@@ -820,8 +810,8 @@ static int __devinit via_rhine_init_one 
 				   (option & 0x220 ? "full" : "half"));
 			if (np->mii_cnt)
 				mdio_write(dev, np->phys[0], MII_BMCR,
-						   ((option & 0x300) ? 0x2000 : 0) |  /* 100mbps? */
-						   ((option & 0x220) ? 0x0100 : 0));  /* Full duplex? */
+						   ((option & 0x300) ? BMCR_SPEED100 : 0) |  /* 100mbps? */
+						   ((option & 0x220) ? BMCR_FULLDPLX : 0));  /* Full duplex? */
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1021,7 +1011,7 @@ static void init_registers(struct net_de
 	writew(IntrRxDone | IntrRxErr | IntrRxEmpty| IntrRxOverflow |
 		   IntrRxDropped | IntrRxNoBuf | IntrTxAborted |
 		   IntrTxDone | IntrTxError | IntrTxUnderrun |
-		   IntrPCIErr | IntrStatsMax | IntrLinkChange | IntrMIIChange,
+		   IntrPCIErr | IntrStatsMax | IntrLinkChange,
 		   ioaddr + IntrEnable);
 
 	np->chip_cmd = CmdStart|CmdTxOn|CmdRxOn|CmdNoTxPoll;
@@ -1066,10 +1056,10 @@ static void mdio_write(struct net_device
 	if (phy_id == np->phys[0]) {
 		switch (regnum) {
 		case MII_BMCR:					/* Is user forcing speed/duplex? */
-			if (value & 0x9000)			/* Autonegotiation. */
+			if (value & (BMCR_ANENABLE | BMCR_RESET))	/* Autonegotiation. */
 				np->mii_if.force_media = 0;
 			else
-				np->mii_if.full_duplex = (value & 0x0100) ? 1 : 0;
+				np->mii_if.full_duplex = (value & BMCR_FULLDPLX) ? 1 : 0;
 			break;
 		case MII_ADVERTISE:
 			np->mii_if.advertising = value;
@@ -1175,8 +1165,8 @@ static void via_rhine_timer(unsigned lon
 
 	/* make IFF_RUNNING follow the MII status bit "Link established" */
 	mii_status = mdio_read(dev, np->phys[0], MII_BMSR);
-	if ( (mii_status & MIILink) != (np->mii_status & MIILink) ) {
-		if (mii_status & MIILink)
+	if ( (mii_status & BMSR_LSTATUS) != (np->mii_status & BMSR_LSTATUS) ) {
+		if (mii_status & BMSR_LSTATUS)
 			netif_carrier_on(dev);
 		else
 			netif_carrier_off(dev);
@@ -1320,7 +1310,7 @@ static void via_rhine_interrupt(int irq,
 			via_rhine_tx(dev);
 
 		/* Abnormal error summary/uncommon events handlers. */
-		if (intr_status & (IntrPCIErr | IntrLinkChange | IntrMIIChange |
+		if (intr_status & (IntrPCIErr | IntrLinkChange |
 				   IntrStatsMax | IntrTxError | IntrTxAborted |
 				   IntrTxUnderrun))
 			via_rhine_error(dev, intr_status);
@@ -1515,7 +1505,7 @@ static void via_rhine_rx(struct net_devi
 	writew(CmdRxDemand | np->chip_cmd, dev->base_addr + ChipCmd);
 }
 
-static inline void via_restart_tx(struct net_device *dev) {
+static inline void via_rhine_restart_tx(struct net_device *dev) {
 	struct netdev_private *np = dev->priv;
 	int entry = np->dirty_tx % TX_RING_SIZE;
 
@@ -1526,6 +1516,17 @@ static inline void via_restart_tx(struct
 	writew(CmdTxDemand | np->chip_cmd, dev->base_addr + ChipCmd);
 }
 
+/* Clears the "tally counters" for CRC errors and missed frames(?).
+   It has been reported that some chips need a write of 0 to clear
+   these, for others the counters are set to 1 when written to and
+   instead cleared when read. So we clear them both ways ... */
+static inline void clear_tally_counters(const long ioaddr)
+{
+	writel(0, ioaddr + RxMissed);
+	readw(ioaddr + RxCRCErrs);
+	readw(ioaddr + RxMissed);
+}
+
 static void via_rhine_error(struct net_device *dev, int intr_status)
 {
 	struct netdev_private *np = dev->priv;
@@ -1533,7 +1534,7 @@ static void via_rhine_error(struct net_d
 
 	spin_lock (&np->lock);
 
-	if (intr_status & (IntrMIIChange | IntrLinkChange)) {
+	if (intr_status & (IntrLinkChange)) {
 		if (readb(ioaddr + MIIStatus) & 0x02) {
 			/* Link failed, restart autonegotiation. */
 			if (np->drv_flags & HasDavicomPhy)
@@ -1551,11 +1552,11 @@ static void via_rhine_error(struct net_d
 		np->stats.rx_missed_errors	+= readw(ioaddr + RxMissed);
 		clear_tally_counters(ioaddr);
 	}
-	if (intr_status & IntrTxError) {
+	if (intr_status & IntrTxAborted) {
 		if (debug > 1)
 			printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Abort %4.4x, frame dropped.\n",
 				   dev->name, intr_status);
-		via_restart_tx(dev);
+		via_rhine_restart_tx(dev);
 	}
 	if (intr_status & IntrTxUnderrun) {
 		if (np->tx_thresh < 0xE0)
@@ -1564,9 +1565,9 @@ static void via_rhine_error(struct net_d
 			printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Transmitter underrun, Tx "
 				   "threshold now %2.2x.\n",
 				   dev->name, np->tx_thresh);
-		via_restart_tx(dev);
+		via_rhine_restart_tx(dev);
 	}
-	if (intr_status & ~( IntrLinkChange | IntrStatsMax |
+	if (intr_status & ~( IntrLinkChange | IntrStatsMax | IntrTxUnderrun |
  						 IntrTxError | IntrTxAborted | IntrNormalSummary)) {
 		if (debug > 1)
 			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Something Wicked happened! %4.4x.\n",
@@ -1593,17 +1594,6 @@ static struct net_device_stats *via_rhin
 	return &np->stats;
 }
 
-/* Clears the "tally counters" for CRC errors and missed frames(?).
-   It has been reported that some chips need a write of 0 to clear
-   these, for others the counters are set to 1 when written to and
-   instead cleared when read. So we clear them both ways ... */
-static inline void clear_tally_counters(const long ioaddr)
-{
-	writel(0, ioaddr + RxMissed);
-	readw(ioaddr + RxCRCErrs);
-	readw(ioaddr + RxMissed);
-}
-
 static void via_rhine_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct netdev_private *np = dev->priv;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-02-11 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-11 13:43 via rhine bug? (timeouts and resets) Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 14:18 ` Gianni Tedesco
2003-02-11 14:34   ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 16:44     ` Alan Cox
2003-02-11 15:44 ` Roger Luethi [this message]
2003-02-11 16:51   ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 17:17     ` Roger Luethi
2003-02-11 17:44       ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 18:39         ` Roger Luethi
2003-02-11 18:55           ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 19:31             ` Roger Luethi
2003-02-11 20:31               ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 21:15                 ` Roger Luethi
2003-02-11 17:44   ` Alan Cox
2003-02-12 12:52     ` Roger Luethi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-12 14:58 Christian Guggenberger
2003-02-12 16:41 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-12 17:06   ` Christian Guggenberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030211154449.GA2252@k3.hellgate.ch \
    --to=rl@hellgate.ch \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nix@socialism.nu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox