From: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: via rhine bug? (timeouts and resets)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:52:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030212125216.GA5259@k3.hellgate.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1044985492.14143.2.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:44:53 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> I'd be happy to test via-rhine stuff, but my boxes don't generally like
> 2.5.x so I can only usefully test 2.4.x fixes
No prob. AFAIK the only significant difference 2.4/2.5 is the change you
made in 2.4.21pre4-ac1 (which, being short of IO-APIC hw, I can't test):
o Always set interrupt line with VIA northbridge (me)
| Should fix apic mode problems with USB/audio/net on VIA boards
Besides that, Rhine drivers are in sync and should fail (or work)
identically in both trees.
However, unlike previous patches, changes pending now are not "obviously
right", so they need regression testing. 1.1.15exp1 for example cut the
time allowed for chip reset by three orders of magnitude [1]. Upcoming
patches will likely reshuffle code logic in order to fix races and bugs in
the current code.
So, thanks for the offer. If you can give 1.1.15exp1 a spin that'd be a
good start. It does fix a few existing problems and should not introduce
any new ones.
Roger
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=104050723916958&w=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-12 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-11 13:43 via rhine bug? (timeouts and resets) Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 14:18 ` Gianni Tedesco
2003-02-11 14:34 ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 16:44 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-11 15:44 ` Roger Luethi
2003-02-11 16:51 ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 17:17 ` Roger Luethi
2003-02-11 17:44 ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 18:39 ` Roger Luethi
2003-02-11 18:55 ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 19:31 ` Roger Luethi
2003-02-11 20:31 ` Henrik Persson
2003-02-11 21:15 ` Roger Luethi
2003-02-11 17:44 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-12 12:52 ` Roger Luethi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-12 14:58 Christian Guggenberger
2003-02-12 16:41 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-12 17:06 ` Christian Guggenberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030212125216.GA5259@k3.hellgate.ch \
--to=rl@hellgate.ch \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox