From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:44:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:44:40 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:56208 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:44:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 19:49:12 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Andreas Arens Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD IDE oops in current 2.4-ac Message-ID: <20030212194912.GA24138@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Andreas Arens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk References: <20030212204815.A8782@www.goron.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030212204815.A8782@www.goron.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 08:48:15PM +0100, Andreas Arens wrote: > Current 2.4.21-pre4-ac kernels oops in amd74xx.c with > certain chipsets due to a table order problem. The > problem is correctly detected by a BUG() in the pci probe > routine, which should trigger for all non-nforce chipsets. If moving entries in the table caused a bug, adding new entries could do the same too perhaps ? This sounds quite fragile based on your description & diff. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs