From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:36:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:36:40 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:4008 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:36:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:41:51 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Andrew Morton , Bill Davidsen , larry@minfin.bg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Strange TCP with 2.5.60 Message-ID: <20030214144151.GA29133@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , "Martin J. Bligh" , Andrew Morton , Bill Davidsen , larry@minfin.bg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030212102418.3a15b4a8.akpm@digeo.com> <20030213153748.1e4df3cc.akpm@digeo.com> <17320000.1045185481@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17320000.1045185481@[10.10.2.4]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Apparently the problem is that this combined with recent seq_file > > conversions has resulted in changed format of some /proc/net/foo files, > > which is confusing some network admin apps. > > > > It is being worked on. > > Can't we do: > > - if (iter->zone->fz_next) > + /* if (iter->zone->fz_next) */ > > or something similar? Is much less confusing ... See "It is being worked on" 8-) Better to fix it properly.. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk