public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.61-mm1 +/- as or cfq with contest
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 20:53:36 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200302162053.36119.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030216095149.GA6521@suse.de>

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 08:51 pm, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16 2003, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Here are contest (http://contest.kolivas.org) results with osdl
> > (http://www.osdl.org) hardware for 2.5.61-mm1 with either the as i/o
> > scheduler or the cfq scheduler.
> >
> > io_load:
> > Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> > 2.5.60-mm1          3   112     67.0    15.7    7.1     1.42
> > 2.5.61              2   143     52.4    32.9    13.3    1.81
> > 2.5.61-mm1          2   634     12.5    257.3   24.6    7.83
> > 2.5.61-mm1cfq       3   397     19.6    123.3   18.1    5.03
>
> These loo fishy, could be some other interaction. I'm consistently
> beating 2.5.60-mm1/2.5.61 on io_load here, but that is 2.5.61 base and
> not 2.5.61-mm1 base. Could be something odd happening there.

I dont think they're fishy - taken in the mm1 context -. I have tested cfq3a 
without mm1 and it does beat the baseline. See a previous email I posted with 
it.

Con

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-16  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-16  9:46 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.61-mm1 +/- as or cfq with contest Con Kolivas
2003-02-16  9:51 ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-16  9:53   ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-02-16  9:59     ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-16 10:43       ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-16 10:45         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200302162053.36119.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox