From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:33:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:33:03 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:37765 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:33:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:55:36 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Pavel Machek Cc: kernel list Subject: Re: cpufreq on athlon4 Message-ID: <20030217005536.GB17448@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Pavel Machek , kernel list References: <20030215221236.GA210@elf.ucw.cz> <20030216144941.GA4459@codemonkey.org.uk> <20030216160306.GC2367@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030216160306.GC2367@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 05:03:06PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Its likely at some point I'll implement a way to override using > > the BIOS table too. > > So you think that in fact I should be able to run at lower > voltage? I've seen two different laptops from differnent vendors both with the same CPU, with wildly differing PST tables, so its very likely yes. And the fact that the powernow registers state that it supports voltage scaling, and then not offering any in the PST seems a bit silly. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk