public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>,
	kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, davem@redhat.com, kronos@kronoz.cjb.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@tranmseta.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:31:33 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030218024852.9557D2C17F@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:53:04 BST." <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302171112390.1336-100000@serv>

In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302171112390.1336-100000@serv> you write:
> Maybe you could share a bit of your wisdom?
> 1. Doing the linking in userspace requires two steps, but I still don't 
> know what's so bad about it.
> 2. This still doesn't explain, why everything has to be moved into kernel, 
> why can't we move more into userspace?
> 3. You simply moved part of the query syscall functionality to 
> /proc/modules (which btw is still not enough to fix ksymoops).

I think you'd do far better to implement it yourself for half a dozen
architectures.  It's not my job to teach you things which can be
gained by reading the code and thinking a little.

We're going in a circle again.

> > The second change was the speed up one system of module locking in the
> > kernel which wasn't racy, and deprecate the other system which was
> > racy in 99% of its uses.  That is all.
> 
> Well, I'm not against optimizing the module locking (*), as we won't get 
> rid of it in the near feature, but it still has problems.
> 
> 1. It's adding complexity (however you implement it), I explained it in 
> detail and you still haven't told me, where I'm wrong.

No, it's exactly the same as before.  You can't see that, and I've
given up explaining it.

> 2. The module interface is incompatible with other kernel interfaces, I 
> tried to explain that in the mail from saturday, if you think I'm wrong, 
> your input is very welcome, but _please_ answer to that mail.

This problem is in your mind Roman.

Deal with it.

> > Did it solve all the races in the kernel?  Of course not.  But it's
> > simple to use, already well understood in the kernel, and avoids
> > massive changes.  It also allows connection tracking to be properly
> > modularized, which was my long-lost original purpose.
> 
> It's too much fun to quote Al here:

Quoting Al's rant isn't an argument.  It wasn't very coherent when he
wrote it, and it doesn't gain with repetition.

The code exists.  It's simple to use.

I give up.  You're killfiled again 8(
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-18  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-02 22:50 [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Kronos
2003-01-03  5:10 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-03  8:37   ` David S. Miller
2003-01-04  6:09     ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-04 16:21       ` Kronos
2003-01-13 22:32   ` kuznet
2003-01-13 23:23     ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-01-14 17:49     ` Kronos
2003-01-15  0:21       ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-15  1:19         ` kuznet
2003-01-15  7:31           ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-15  8:16             ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-15  9:33               ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16  1:12                 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-16  2:42                   ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16  3:31                     ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-16  4:20                       ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16  4:25                       ` David S. Miller
2003-01-16  4:49                         ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16 16:05                         ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-16 18:15                     ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-16 18:58                       ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16 23:53                         ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-17  1:04                           ` Greg KH
2003-01-17  2:27                     ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-17 21:40                       ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-13 23:16                       ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14  1:57                         ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-14  3:44                           ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 11:16                           ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-14 12:04                             ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-14 12:49                               ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-17  1:59                                 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-17 10:53                                   ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-17 23:31                                     ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2003-02-18 12:26                                       ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-14 13:21                               ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-14 13:53                                 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 14:24                                   ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-14 18:30                                     ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 20:09                                       ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-15  0:12                                         ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-15  0:51                                           ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-15  2:28                                             ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-15 23:20                                               ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-17 17:04                                                 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-17 23:09                                                   ` [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible? Roman Zippel
2003-02-18  1:18                                                     ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-18  4:54                                                       ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-18  7:20                                                         ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-18 12:06                                                           ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-18 14:12                                                             ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-18 12:45                                                               ` Thomas Molina
2003-02-18 17:22                                                               ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-19  3:30                                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-19  4:11                                                                   ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-19 23:38                                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-20  9:46                                                                       ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-20  0:40                                                                 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-20  2:17                                                                   ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-23 16:02                                                                     ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-26 23:26                                                                       ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-27 12:34                                                                         ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-27 13:20                                                                           ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-27 14:33                                                                             ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-23 23:34                                                                 ` Kevin O'Connor
2003-02-24 12:14                                                                   ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-18 12:35                                                           ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-18 14:14                                                             ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-19  1:48                                                       ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-19  2:27                                                         ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16 13:44                   ` [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Roman Zippel
2003-01-15 17:04               ` Roman Zippel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030218024852.9557D2C17F@lists.samba.org \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=kronos@kronoz.cjb.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@tranmseta.com \
    --cc=wa@almesberger.net \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox