From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:43:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:43:12 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:51211 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:43:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:53:09 +0000 From: Russell King To: Alan Cox Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH: make the sl82c105 work again Message-ID: <20030218185309.C9785@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Alan Cox , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:34:29PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:34:29PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > + hwif->drives[0].pio_speed = XFER_PIO_0; > + hwif->drives[0].autotune = 1; > + hwif->drives[1].pio_speed = XFER_PIO_1; > + hwif->drives[1].autotune = 1; Is there some reason why drive 1 is PIO 1 and drive 0 is PIO 0 ? -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html