From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:27:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:27:52 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:61907 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:27:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:21:53 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030221.152153.33801109.davem@redhat.com> To: pavel@suse.cz Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: ioctl32 consolidation From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20030221113428.GF24049@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20030220223119.GA18545@elf.ucw.cz> <20030220224433.GV9800@gtf.org> <20030221113428.GF24049@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Pavel Machek Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:34:29 +0100 > I do not know if it is too late in 2.5.x to begin this work, however. > We _are_ in a feature freeze... I suppose it is up to the consensus of > arch maintainers, because it [obviously] does not affect ia32. Actually Andi asked me to do the work. Dave, is it okay with you? What about other maintainers? I'm totally fine with it.