From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:31:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:31:24 -0500 Received: from havoc.daloft.com ([64.213.145.173]:28866 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:31:23 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:41:28 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: David Dillow Cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: typhoon rx_copybreak Message-ID: <20030222214128.GC27739@gtf.org> References: <20030222.004504.113090900.davem@redhat.com> <3E57D54A.5FCDD811@thedillows.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E57D54A.5FCDD811@thedillows.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 02:53:46PM -0500, David Dillow wrote: > Done. Pushed to > bk://typhoon.bkbits.net/typhoon-2.4 > bk://typhoon.bkbits.net/typhoon-2.5 I hope you don't mind my CC'ing lkml. I think may be useful information for others, as well. For submitting net driver changes via BK, I would request what I request of others using BK (and what Marcelo requests of me): Send me a separate email with an easily noticable subject, something like "[BK] typhoon net driver fixes/updates/whatever", including the output of Documentation/BK-usage/bk-make-sum. Typically this is done like cd typhoon-2.4 bk-make-sum ../linux-vanilla-2.4 vi /tmp/linus.txt (fix URL, or whatever) email /tmp/linus.txt to me then, additional email the broken-out GNU diffs for review. Here is an example, though there are several other ways to do this: cd typhoon-2.4 bk changes -L ../linux-vanilla-2.4 2>&1 | \ perl csets-to-patches.pl # edit /tmp/rev-*.patch, and email, one per email bk-make-sum and csets-to-patches are shipped in Documentation/BK-usage in both 2.4.x and 2.5.x. And, unless the 2.4 and 2.5 patches are 100.0000% the same, send patches for both 2.4 and 2.5. This spams me with a lot of email, but really does optimize the submission process, and gets your updates into the mainline kernel very quickly. Ideally, I just have to do "read, read, read, cut-n-paste your supplied bk pull URL" Thanks and regards, Jeff P.S. Nice work on the driver. Even if technical issues are found, it's very clean and easy to review and debug.