From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
vs@namesys.com, nikita@namesys.com, jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4 iget5_locked port attempt to 2.4 (supposedly fixed NFS version this time)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:26:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030224202619.A18641@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15962.21418.869267.676983@charged.uio.no>
Hello!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:17:30PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >> like that keeps turning the clock backward on the server, then
> >> the NFS client has no chance of recognizing which attribute
> >> updates are the more recent ones.
> > Ok, I stopped ntpd. Will see what will happen. ;) Aha, it died
> > already: doread: read: Input/output error
> Silly question: Are you perhaps testing using the 'soft' mount option?
Hm. I just mount it as
mount server:/tmp /mnt -t nfs
no extra options. So I guess no, I do not have wthis soft stuff.
> > How about that "RPC request reserved 1144 but used 4024" alike
> > stuff"?
> Sounds like Neil made another accounting error in the server code
> 8-). Can you try to check on which type of request it occurs (readdir,
> read, readlink?).
Ok. Will try (I guess I need to do this on latest 2.4 kernel anyway.
(my nfs server is running 2.4.20)).
Bye,
Oleg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-24 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030220175309.A23616@namesys.com>
[not found] ` <20030220154924.7171cbd7.akpm@digeo.com>
2003-02-21 19:03 ` 2.4 iget5_locked port attempt to 2.4 Oleg Drokin
2003-02-21 20:04 ` Jan Harkes
2003-02-22 9:29 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-02-24 10:21 ` 2.4 iget5_locked port attempt to 2.4 (supposedly fixed NFS version this time) Oleg Drokin
2003-02-24 16:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-02-24 17:02 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-02-24 17:03 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-02-24 17:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-02-24 17:26 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
2003-02-24 17:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-02-24 17:38 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-03-03 14:09 ` 2.4 iget5_locked port attempt to 2.4 Oleg Drokin
2003-03-03 16:25 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-03 15:35 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-03-03 15:38 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-03-03 15:57 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-03-03 16:04 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-03-03 16:27 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-03-03 16:45 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-03-03 16:50 ` Jan Harkes
2003-03-03 16:57 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-03-03 17:23 ` Jan Harkes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030224202619.A18641@namesys.com \
--to=green@namesys.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikita@namesys.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=vs@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox