From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
"Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390 (7/13): gcc 3.3 adaptions.
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:53:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030224215335.GA24975@gtf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jeznol5plv.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:35:24PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
>
> |> Does gcc still warn about things like
> |>
> |> #define COUNT (sizeof(array)/sizeof(element))
> |>
> |> int i;
> |> for (i = 0; i < COUNT; i++)
> |> ...
> |>
> |> where COUNT is obviously unsigned (because sizeof is size_t and thus
> |> unsigned)?
> |>
> |> Gcc used to complain about things like that, which is a FUCKING DISASTER.
>
> How can you distinguish that from other occurrences of (int)<(size_t)?
The bounds are obviously constant and unsigned at compile time.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-24 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-24 18:10 [PATCH] s390 (7/13): gcc 3.3 adaptions Martin Schwidefsky
2003-02-24 19:44 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-24 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-24 21:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-02-24 21:33 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-24 21:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-02-24 21:53 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-02-24 22:07 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-02-24 22:21 ` Jörn Engel
2003-02-24 22:31 ` Jörn Engel
2003-02-25 12:34 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-02-24 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-25 0:20 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-24 23:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-25 0:40 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-24 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-25 5:24 ` Chris Wedgwood
2003-02-25 12:25 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-25 12:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-02-25 15:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-25 15:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-02-25 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-25 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-25 16:26 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-02-25 16:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-24 22:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-24 22:39 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-02-24 23:52 ` John Alvord
2003-02-24 21:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-03-01 3:12 ` Richard Henderson
[not found] <20030224195008$59ef@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030224195008$40bd@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-02-24 20:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2003-02-24 20:49 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030224215335.GA24975@gtf.org \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox