public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cpufreq: allow user to specify voltage
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:24:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030225182414.GA3242@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030225180311.GI12028@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

Hi!

On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:03:11PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Well, look again; if you use mVforce, it forces *just one* frequency
> (min=max=freq you specified), so it is actually okay.
But min=max=freq is awful... I know, I reccommended it sometimes, but with
the appearance of the userspace governor (already available on the cpufreq
homepage, http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq/advanced.html , will be submitted
soon) min=max=freq is deprecated.

> But I agree that hacking proc_intf is not the right thing to do. I did
> not see that sysfs access. Where is it?

kernel/cpufreq.c

> > - selecting the voltage manually is something which is only valid for some
> >   very few drivers - so let's only export one sysfs file[*] for these
> >   drivers.
> 
> Very few drivers? It should be common for at least Intel and AMD, no?
No. Intel doesn't let you select the exact voltage. IIRC, only vew 
VIA/Cyrix-longhaul-capable processors and, of course, powernow-k7 are vaild
targets for such a patch.

	Dominik

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-25 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-24 22:55 cpufreq: allow user to specify voltage Pavel Machek
2003-02-25  0:41 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-02-25 18:03   ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-25 18:24     ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2003-02-25 19:09       ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-25 19:28         ` John Clemens
2003-02-25 19:33           ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-28 21:16             ` [PATCH][RFC] " Dominik Brodowski
2003-03-06  0:29               ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-06  0:36               ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-06 20:42               ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030225182414.GA3242@brodo.de \
    --to=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox