From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.62/3 with contest
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:45:56 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200302252145.56853.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
Here are a set of contest (http://contest.kolivas.org) benchmarks with the
osdl hardware (http://www.osdl.org) for .62 and .63
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.60 2 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.61 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.62 3 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.63 4 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.60 2 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.61 1 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.62 3 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.63 4 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 92 81.5 29.7 17.4 1.16
2.5.60 2 93 80.6 30.5 17.2 1.18
2.5.61 1 93 80.6 29.0 16.1 1.18
2.5.62 3 92 81.5 30.0 16.3 1.16
2.5.63 4 92 81.5 28.2 15.2 1.16
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 98 80.6 2.0 5.1 1.24
2.5.60 2 99 78.8 1.0 4.0 1.25
2.5.61 2 100 79.0 1.0 4.0 1.27
2.5.62 3 99 79.8 1.0 4.0 1.25
2.5.63 3 99 79.8 1.0 4.0 1.25
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29
2.5.60 2 101 76.2 1.0 5.0 1.28
2.5.61 2 102 75.5 1.0 4.9 1.29
2.5.62 3 103 73.8 1.0 3.9 1.30
2.5.63 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 152 50.0 34.1 13.1 1.92
2.5.60 2 139 54.7 29.0 12.1 1.76
2.5.61 2 143 52.4 32.9 13.3 1.81
2.5.62 2 205 36.6 51.7 15.0 2.59
2.5.63 5 217 35.0 56.7 15.1 2.75
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 89 84.3 11.2 5.6 1.13
2.5.60 2 90 83.3 10.8 5.5 1.14
2.5.61 2 91 82.4 11.1 5.5 1.15
2.5.62 2 96 78.1 15.7 8.2 1.22
2.5.63 4 95 78.9 15.3 8.3 1.20
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 101 77.2 6.5 5.0 1.28
2.5.60 2 103 74.8 6.2 6.8 1.30
2.5.61 2 102 77.5 6.3 4.9 1.29
2.5.62 2 103 75.7 6.2 4.9 1.30
2.5.63 3 106 74.5 5.7 4.7 1.34
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.60 2 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.61 2 95 81.1 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.62 2 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.63 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 95 82.1 52.7 2.1 1.20
2.5.60 2 98 79.6 53.0 2.0 1.24
2.5.61 1 96 81.2 54.0 2.1 1.22
2.5.62 2 101 78.2 59.0 2.0 1.28
2.5.63 3 104 75.0 57.7 1.9 1.32
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 214 36.4 2.3 40.7 2.71
2.5.61 2 237 32.5 3.0 47.3 3.00
2.5.62 2 226 34.1 2.5 42.0 2.86
2.5.63 4 194 39.2 2.0 38.7 2.46
io_load seems to have increased significantly since .62.
mem_load has also grown but the significance of this seems low in the grand
scheme of things.
Con
reply other threads:[~2003-02-25 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200302252145.56853.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox