From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 05:35:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 05:35:47 -0500 Received: from c16639.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.244.5]:9662 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 05:35:45 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.62/3 with contest Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:45:56 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302252145.56853.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Here are a set of contest (http://contest.kolivas.org) benchmarks with the osdl hardware (http://www.osdl.org) for .62 and .63 no_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00 2.5.60 2 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00 2.5.61 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00 2.5.62 3 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00 2.5.63 4 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00 cacherun: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96 2.5.60 2 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95 2.5.61 1 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96 2.5.62 3 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96 2.5.63 4 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96 process_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 92 81.5 29.7 17.4 1.16 2.5.60 2 93 80.6 30.5 17.2 1.18 2.5.61 1 93 80.6 29.0 16.1 1.18 2.5.62 3 92 81.5 30.0 16.3 1.16 2.5.63 4 92 81.5 28.2 15.2 1.16 ctar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 98 80.6 2.0 5.1 1.24 2.5.60 2 99 78.8 1.0 4.0 1.25 2.5.61 2 100 79.0 1.0 4.0 1.27 2.5.62 3 99 79.8 1.0 4.0 1.25 2.5.63 3 99 79.8 1.0 4.0 1.25 xtar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29 2.5.60 2 101 76.2 1.0 5.0 1.28 2.5.61 2 102 75.5 1.0 4.9 1.29 2.5.62 3 103 73.8 1.0 3.9 1.30 2.5.63 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29 io_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 152 50.0 34.1 13.1 1.92 2.5.60 2 139 54.7 29.0 12.1 1.76 2.5.61 2 143 52.4 32.9 13.3 1.81 2.5.62 2 205 36.6 51.7 15.0 2.59 2.5.63 5 217 35.0 56.7 15.1 2.75 io_other: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 89 84.3 11.2 5.6 1.13 2.5.60 2 90 83.3 10.8 5.5 1.14 2.5.61 2 91 82.4 11.1 5.5 1.15 2.5.62 2 96 78.1 15.7 8.2 1.22 2.5.63 4 95 78.9 15.3 8.3 1.20 read_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 101 77.2 6.5 5.0 1.28 2.5.60 2 103 74.8 6.2 6.8 1.30 2.5.61 2 102 77.5 6.3 4.9 1.29 2.5.62 2 103 75.7 6.2 4.9 1.30 2.5.63 3 106 74.5 5.7 4.7 1.34 list_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20 2.5.60 2 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20 2.5.61 2 95 81.1 0.0 6.3 1.20 2.5.62 2 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20 2.5.63 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22 mem_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 95 82.1 52.7 2.1 1.20 2.5.60 2 98 79.6 53.0 2.0 1.24 2.5.61 1 96 81.2 54.0 2.1 1.22 2.5.62 2 101 78.2 59.0 2.0 1.28 2.5.63 3 104 75.0 57.7 1.9 1.32 dbench_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.59 3 214 36.4 2.3 40.7 2.71 2.5.61 2 237 32.5 3.0 47.3 3.00 2.5.62 2 226 34.1 2.5 42.0 2.86 2.5.63 4 194 39.2 2.0 38.7 2.46 io_load seems to have increased significantly since .62. mem_load has also grown but the significance of this seems low in the grand scheme of things. Con