From: rwhron@earthlink.net
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@digeo.com
Subject: Re: IO scheduler benchmarking
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:57:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030225215755.GA2038@rushmore> (raw)
> Why does 2.5.62-mm2 have higher sequential
> write latency than 2.5.61-mm1?
Anticipatory scheduler tiobench profile on uniprocessor:
2.5.61-mm1 2.5.62-mm2
total 1993387 1933241
default_idle 1873179 1826650
system_call 49838 43036
get_offset_tsc 21905 20883
do_schedule 13893 10344
do_gettimeofday 8478 6044
sys_gettimeofday 8077 5153
current_kernel_time 4904 12165
syscall_exit 4047 1243
__wake_up 1274 1000
io_schedule 1166 1039
prepare_to_wait 1093 792
schedule_timeout 612 366
delay_tsc 502 443
get_fpu_cwd 473 376
syscall_call 389 378
math_state_restore 354 271
restore_fpu 329 287
del_timer 325 200
device_not_available 290 377
finish_wait 257 181
add_timer 218 137
io_schedule_timeout 195 72
cpu_idle 193 218
run_timer_softirq 137 33
remove_wait_queue 121 188
eligible_child 106 154
sys_wait4 105 162
work_resched 104 110
ret_from_intr 97 74
dup_task_struct 75 48
add_wait_queue 67 124
__cond_resched 59 69
do_page_fault 55 0
do_softirq 53 12
pte_alloc_one 51 67
release_task 44 55
get_signal_to_deliver 38 43
get_wchan 16 10
mod_timer 15 0
old_mmap 14 19
prepare_to_wait_exclusive 10 32
mm_release 7 0
release_x86_irqs 7 8
sys_getppid 6 5
handle_IRQ_event 4 0
schedule_tail 4 0
kill_proc_info 3 0
device_not_available_emulate 2 0
task_prio 1 1
__down 0 33
__down_failed_interruptible 0 3
init_fpu 0 12
pgd_ctor 0 3
process_timeout 0 2
restore_all 0 2
sys_exit 0 2
--
Randy Hron
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-25 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-25 21:57 rwhron [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25 12:59 IO scheduler benchmarking rwhron
2003-02-25 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-25 5:35 rwhron
2003-02-25 6:38 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 5:23 Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 6:51 ` David Lang
2003-02-21 8:16 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 10:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-21 10:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-21 11:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-21 11:17 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-21 11:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-21 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-23 15:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-21 11:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-21 12:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030225215755.GA2038@rushmore \
--to=rwhron@earthlink.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox