From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: schlicht@uni-mannheim.de, torvalds@transmeta.com,
hugh@veritas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5] fix preempt-issues with smp_call_function()
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:19:05 -0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030226111905.GA32415@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030226015409.78e8e1fb.akpm@digeo.com>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:54:09AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Just one comment. You moved quite a few of the preempt_disable/enable
> > pairs outside of the CONFIG_SMP checks. The issue we're working against
> > here is to try and prevent preemption and ending up on a different CPU.
> > As this cannot happen if CONFIG_SMP=n, I don't see why you've done this.
> Just in two places.
Ok, slight exaggeration 8-) Looks good to me.
btw, (unrelated) shouldn't smp_call_function be doing magick checks
with cpu_online() ?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-26 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-25 18:08 [PATCH][2.5] fix preempt-issues with smp_call_function() Thomas Schlichter
2003-02-26 9:27 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-26 10:37 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-26 9:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-26 10:14 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-02-26 11:19 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-02-26 10:28 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-26 10:52 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-02-26 11:28 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-26 13:39 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-26 18:47 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-26 20:11 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-26 16:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-21 14:20 [PATCH][2.5] replace flush_map() in arch/i386/mm/pageattr.c w ith flush_tlb_all() Dave Jones
2003-02-21 17:36 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-22 3:23 ` [PATCH][2.5] fix preempt-issues with smp_call_function() Thomas Schlichter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030226111905.GA32415@suse.de \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schlicht@uni-mannheim.de \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox