From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@cc.hut.fi>
Subject: Re: Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:22:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030226192255.GA20127@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1030226131903.4664A-100000@chaos>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:23:19PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 11:33:09PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > > Jean Tourrilhes writes:
> > >
> > > > It looks like a compiler bug to me...
> > > > Some users have complained that when the following
> > > > code is compiled without the -fno-strict-aliasing,
> > > > the order of the write and memcpy is inverted (which
> > > > mean a bogus len is mem-copied into the stream).
> > > > Code (from linux/include/net/iw_handler.h) :
> > > > --------------------------------------------
> > > > static inline char *
> > > > iwe_stream_add_event(char * stream, /* Stream of events */
> > > > char * ends, /* End of stream */
> > > > struct iw_event *iwe, /* Payload */
> > > > int event_len) /* Real size of payload */
> > > > {
> > > > /* Check if it's possible */
> > > > if((stream + event_len) < ends) {
> > > > iwe->len = event_len;
> > > > memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len);
> > > > stream += event_len;
> > > > } return stream;
> > > > }
> > > > --------------------------------------------
> > > > IMHO, the compiler should have enough context to
> > > > know that the reordering is dangerous. Any suggestion
> > > > to make this simple code more bullet proof is welcomed.
> > > >
> > > > Have fun...
> > >
> > > Since (char*) is special, I agree that it's a bug.
> > > In any case, a warning sure would be nice!
> > >
> > > Now for the fun. Pass iwe->len into this
> > > macro before the memcpy, and all should be well.
> > >
> > > #define FORCE_TO_MEM(x) asm volatile(""::"r"(&(x)))
> > >
> > > Like this:
> > >
> > > iwe->len = event_len;
> > > FORCE_TO_MEM(iwe->len);
> > > memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len);
> >
> > I'll try that, that sounds absolutely clever (but I only
> > understand half of it).
> > Thanks a lot !
> >
> > Jean
> > -
>
> This does absoultely nothing with egcs-2.91.66. I also modified
>
> #define FORCE_TO_MEM(x) asm volatile(""::"r"(&(x)))
> |________ this to "memory"
>
> and it still does nothing. The result of gcc -O2 -S -o xxx xxx.c just
> shows:
>
> #AP
> #NOAP
>
> With no code in-between.
>
> I also changed it to:
> #define FORCE_TO_MEM(x) __asm__ __volatile__(""::"r"(&(x)))
> to no avail.
>
> What's up?
That's "working". Does it prevent the reordering?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-26 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-26 4:33 Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing Albert Cahalan
2003-02-26 17:20 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 18:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-02-26 19:40 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 20:19 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 21:30 ` Albert Cahalan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25 23:46 Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 15:38 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 16:04 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-02-26 20:47 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 20:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 22:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-02-27 19:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 19:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 20:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 23:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-01 8:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-02-26 17:22 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 21:07 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-27 4:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-02-26 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030226192255.GA20127@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jkmaline@cc.hut.fi \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox