From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Cc: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>,
jt@hpl.hp.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:57:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030226205754.GA29466@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200302262047.h1QKlm0P001784@eeyore.valparaiso.cl>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:47:48PM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de> said:
> > Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl> writes:
> > > Jean Tourrilhes <jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com> said:
> > > > if((stream + event_len) < ends) {
> > > > iwe->len = event_len;
> > > > memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len);
> > > > stream += event_len;
> > > > }
> > > > return stream;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > The compiler is free to assume char *stream and struct iw_event *iwe
> > > point to separate areas of memory, due to strict aliasing.
> >
> > The relevant paragraph of the C99 standard is:
> >
> > An object shall have its stored value accessed only by an lvalue
> > expression that has one of the following types:
> [...]
> > -- a character type.
>
> (char *) gives you a (pointer to) a character type.
>
> > I can't really spot any lvalue here that might violate this rule. It
> > would be nice if somebody could report a bug with a testcase.
>
> stream and (char *) iwe
Stream is not the same storage as iwe, so this is hardly the issue.
Writes to stream don't affect iwe. The problem was the assignment to
iwe->len being moved after the access, according to the report.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-26 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-25 23:46 Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 15:38 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 16:04 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-02-26 20:47 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 20:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-02-26 22:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-02-27 19:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 19:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 20:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 23:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-01 8:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-02-26 17:22 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 21:07 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-27 4:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-02-26 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-26 4:33 Albert Cahalan
2003-02-26 17:20 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 18:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 19:40 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 20:19 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 21:30 ` Albert Cahalan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030226205754.GA29466@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox