From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>
To: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Slowing down disk access?
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:35:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030228143528.GA2432@rdlg.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2960 bytes --]
I've got a system I need to slow down disk access on it would seem. The
syerver, a dual 1.5Ghz Athalon has two 3ware IDE controllers, 8 disks
each for a total of sixteen 180 Gig disks. This system is laid out in
four RAID5 arrays that it shares out via NFS. kernel 2.4.19-ac4, ext3
file systems. I've got 7 of these.
This works great and provides a LOT of cheap disk that we use for
staging backups before cloning off to tape.
The problem is that when the array's get pounded HARD, such as when
legato is cleaning it's file devices (nsrstage -C) the machine will lock
up and spew errors to my console:
3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: Command failed: status = 0xc7, flags = 0x1b, unit #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
3w-xxxx: scsi1: AEN: WARNING: ATA port timeout: Port #7.
This requires a hard reboot. If I use the magic keys and reset it then
it goes down but doesn't come back up properly, usually dieing around
the LILO area, I believe the array or disks are left in an odd state.
Is there a way to actually slow down the disk access/read/write other
than re-making the filesystems? On the other systems the chunk size is
at either 32K or 128K. On this one in particular the chunk size is
1024K which was determined by running a number of tests (bonnie, nfs
reads/writes) and was found to be about the fastest for our money's
worth. The disk hangups didn't appear until just recently. If there's
no other choise I can leave the disks as read only until the data rolls
off then remake them in 32 or 64K.
Any other thoughts?
Robert
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
Diagnosis: witzelsucht
IPv6 = robert@ipv6.rdlg.net http://ipv6.rdlg.net
IPv4 = robert@mail.rdlg.net http://www.rdlg.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-28 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-28 14:35 Robert L. Harris [this message]
2003-02-28 18:03 ` Slowing down disk access? kwijibo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030228143528.GA2432@rdlg.net \
--to=robert.l.harris@rdlg.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox