From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 03:16:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 03:16:53 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:40841 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 03:16:53 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 00:27:00 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: percpu-2.5.63-bkcurr Message-ID: <20030301082700.GD1195@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030301055922.GB1399@holomorphy.com> <20030301073655.GA1195@holomorphy.com> <20030301074035.GB1195@holomorphy.com> <20030301074616.GC1195@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030301074616.GC1195@holomorphy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:36:55PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >>> Use per-cpu rq's in the sched.c to avoid remote cache misses there. >>> It actually means something now. On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:40:35PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Tentative followup #2 -- totally untested, at some point I have to >> figure out how to avoid breaking the compile for non-NUMA-Q with this. Tested. it works. -- wli