From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@digeo.com
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] AIM9 results. 2.4.19 vs 2.5.58 vs 2.5.63
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 20:47:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030301124759.10054.qmail@linuxmail.org> (raw)
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:16:16 -0800
To: Paolo Ciarrocchi <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] AIM9 results. 2.4.19 vs 2.5.58 vs 2.5.63
[...]
> Could you compare 63 mainline to -mjb or -mm with objrmap patches in?
> I think you'll get significant improvements on the tests above.
Of course I can.
And here it goes the results:
2.4.19
2.5.63
2.5.63-mjb2
creat-clo 10040 19.4223 19422.31 File Creations and Closes/second
creat-clo 10010 84.3157 84315.68 File Creations and Closes/second
creat-clo 10000 87.4 87400.00 File Creations and Closes/second
^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63
brk_test 10010 48.951 832167.83 System Memory Allocations/second
brk_test 10020 41.018 697305.39 System Memory Allocations/second
brk_test 10000 41.3 702100.00 System Memory Allocations/second
^^^Still slower than 2.4.19
signal_test 10000 166.1 166100.00 Signal Traps/second
signal_test 10000 148.3 148300.00 Signal Traps/second
signal_test 10010 151.748 151748.25 Signal Traps/second
^^^Still slower than 2.4.19
exec_test 10000 13.8 69.00 Program Loads/second
exec_test 10020 12.7745 63.87 Program Loads/second
exec_test 10010 12.987 64.94 Program Loads/second
^^^Still slower than 2.4.19
fork_test 10000 44.8 4480.00 Task Creations/second
fork_test 10000 23.2 2320.00 Task Creations/second
fork_test 10020 30.0399 3003.99 Task Creations/second
^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63
link_test 10000 155.3 9783.90 Link/Unlink Pairs/second
link_test 10010 160.739 10126.57 Link/Unlink Pairs/second
link_test 10010 150.25 9465.73 Link/Unlink Pairs/second
^^^mmh... strange
array_rtns 10010 13.6863 273.73 Linear Systems Solved/second
array_rtns 10020 11.2774 225.55 Linear Systems Solved/second
array_rtns 10050 13.5323 270.65 Linear Systems Solved/second
^^^^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63
mem_rtns_1 10000 27.7 831000.00 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
mem_rtns_1 10020 22.7545 682634.73 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
mem_rtns_1 10020 25.0499 751497.01 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63
misc_rtns_1 10000 782.2 7822.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
misc_rtns_1 10000 686.9 6869.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
misc_rtns_1 10000 709.7 7097.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63
dgram_pipe 10000 2357.8 235780.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second
dgram_pipe 10000 1978 197800.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second
dgram_pipe 10000 2078.1 207810.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second
^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63
Let me know if you need further tests/information.
Ciao,
Paolo
--
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-01 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-01 12:47 Paolo Ciarrocchi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-27 21:39 [BENCHMARK] AIM9 results. 2.4.19 vs 2.5.58 vs 2.5.63 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2003-02-27 22:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030301124759.10054.qmail@linuxmail.org \
--to=ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox