public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacek Kawa <jfk@zeus.polsl.gliwice.pl>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Update to 2.5.x snapshots
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 23:29:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030301222910.GA3983@finwe.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E612A27.2050200@pobox.com>

Jeff Garzik wrote:

> >>Old 2.5.x BK snapshots on kernel.org are now moved into the "old" 
> >>sub-directory, instead of being deleted.
[...]
> >It may not be related, but  
> >http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/testing/cset/
> >has "BitKeeper patches since v2.4.21-pre4: 354 Changesets"
> >(not latest -pre).
> Yep, I know :)
> The point of nightly snapshots is more for users use and testing 
> purposes.  The csets are very useful for developers, but a bit of a 
> moving target for users.

I'm just used to look there from time to time to see 'what is new', and
AFAIR changes were reported against latest prerelease. 
>From my point of view, as long as patches are in chronological order 
it's not a problem. :)

> If users are using the per-cset snapshots, 
> then it becomes a non-trivial chore to developers to track down exactly 
> what version of the kernel a problem is reported against.

Csets are useful for users- e.g. if the problem you want to report does 
not exist in latest cset -but generaly you are right. 

	Jacek


      reply	other threads:[~2003-03-01 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-01 18:23 Update to 2.5.x snapshots Jeff Garzik
2003-03-01 21:16 ` Jacek Kawa
2003-03-01 21:46   ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-01 22:29     ` Jacek Kawa [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030301222910.GA3983@finwe.eu.org \
    --to=jfk@zeus.polsl.gliwice.pl \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox