From: rwhron@earthlink.net
To: akpm@digeo.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.63-mjb2 (scalability / NUMA patchset)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 08:19:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030303131955.GA4655@rushmore> (raw)
> Pleeeeeeze remember to specify basic things such as the machine,
> amount of memory and especially the filesystem type in use.
>> on uniprocessor K6/2 475 Mhz with 384 MB ram
and two IDE drives on ext2.
Could it be a disk driver issue? Maybe 2.4 has some IDE
enhancements that aren't in 2.5 yet. Sounds crazy, but
this is my reasoning...
On a quad Xeon with QLA2200, the QLogic driver makes the
biggest difference for AIM7 dbase test.
Here is AIM7 dbase on quad Xeon with 3.75 GB ram over ext2:
AIM7 dbase workload
kernel Tasks Jobs/Min Real CPU
2.5.62-mm2 32 555.9 342.0 155.2
2.4.21-pre4aa1 32 554.4 342.8 142.3
2.4.21-pre4aa3 32 551.9 344.4 149.6
2.4.21-pre4-ac3 32 473.8 401.2 147.7
2.5.62 32 473.6 401.3 148.2
2.5.63-mjb2 32 472.5 402.3 161.5
2.5.63 32 471.6 403.1 153.1
2.2.24-rc3 32 431.9 440.1 165.7
2.5.62-mm2 has the feral driver. aa has the QLogic 6.x driver.
Those two kernels rule AIM7 dbase and fserver on quad Xeon with
QLA2200. I tested earlier 2.5 and aa with/without the newer
QLogic drivers. It was _the_most_important_ factor for AIM7
dbase and fserver. Perhaps AIM7 dbase and fserver really suck.
They seem rather impervious to other improvements in the kernel.
> Care to share your aim7 database methodology with me?
AIM7 dbase takes a mixture of AIM9 micro activities and runs
them in proportion to what it's developers found a circa 1996
database running.
My methodology was:
0) Scratch head and look for benchmark that does more than one thing.
1) Stumble on AIM7 which purports to test database, fileserver, compute
server and multiuser scalability.
2) Run AIM7 dbase to crossover
3) Find the lowest load where the Jobs/Minute is near it's peak.
4) Use result of 3) for max. Divide into 8 smaller loads.
5) Test all kernels with the same load.
--
Randy Hron
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-03 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-03 13:19 rwhron [this message]
2003-03-03 19:08 ` 2.5.63-mjb2 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-03 2:15 rwhron
2003-02-26 23:19 2.5.63-mjb1 " Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-28 18:51 ` 2.5.63-mjb2 " Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030303131955.GA4655@rushmore \
--to=rwhron@earthlink.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox