From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tighten up serverworks workaround.
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:46:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030303134650.584c9f11.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303031202.h23C2lQ28939@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:02:47 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com> wrote:
> You might want to take Kimball out of unrelated followups
Hm, I am not all that sure that it is completely unrelated. From my point of
view the "big picture" looks like this:
Coming from a system based on VIA-chipset and working perfectly well, we
changed mb to serverworks based TRL-DLS. From that time we experienced and
discussed here:
- strange mtrr settings (solved)
- interrupt sharing problem ide/tg3 (solved)
- reproducably oops'ing cd mounts (on internal ide, with ide-scsi) (not solved)
- latest news: reproducably cold-booting during tar-backup on _second_ streamer
device (dev/st1) on board-internal adaptec controller.
Please note that basic installation/distribution is the same since the VIA
setup.
We are a bit astonished since we expected serverworks-based hardware to perform
_better_ than VIA...
The email you commented is only a small hint that within -pre5 there are still
declared-unknown parts of the chipset. Based on the theory that they are named
"unknown" because nobody around here knows them, it might have been an adequate
idea to ask someone from serverworks, or not? This is in no way meant offensive.
--
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-03 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-26 13:49 Tighten up serverworks workaround davej
2003-02-26 16:27 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-26 16:29 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-26 16:36 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-26 17:27 ` Kimball Brown
2003-02-26 18:03 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-26 18:47 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-02-27 12:14 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-03-03 9:03 ` Mike A. Harris
2003-03-03 10:45 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-03-03 12:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-03 12:46 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-03-03 14:42 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030303134650.584c9f11.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox