public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mem= option for broken bioses
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:18:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030304131855.GE618@zaurus.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3m840_5e4_1@cesium.transmeta.com>

Hi!

> > > I've seen broken bios that did not mark acpi tables in e820
> > > tables. This allows user to override it. Please apply,
> > 
> > OK, looks reasonable. Can you also gen up a patch documenting this in
> > kernel-parameters.txt?
> > 
> 
> This is very much *NOT* reasonable.  In fact, screwing around with the
> syntax of the mem= parameter is poison.  I know it has already
> happened, and those changes need to be reverted and the new stuff
> moved to a different option.
> 
> The mem= option is unique in that it is an option that affects both
> the boot loader and the kernel.  Therefore, ITS SYNTAX MUST NOT
> CHANGE.

This should be commented, somewhere.
Why is mem= option used by boot loader?
Does your bootloader really parse stuff
like mem=exactmap?
-- 
				Pavel
Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need...


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-04 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-26 22:39 mem= option for broken bioses Grover, Andrew
2003-02-26 22:44 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-27 14:27   ` [ACPI] " Robert Woerle Paceblade/Support
2003-02-27 15:19     ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-27 15:49       ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-02-27 16:12         ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-27 15:53       ` Robert Woerle Paceblade/Support
2003-02-27 16:16         ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-27 23:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found] ` <b3m840_5e4_1@cesium.transmeta.com>
2003-03-04 13:18   ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2003-03-04 14:21     ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-26 20:38 Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030304131855.GE618@zaurus.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox