From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com>
Cc: "'Daniel Phillips'" <phillips@arcor.de>,
"James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos@jhcloos.com>,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ext3-users@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: ext3 htree brelse problems look to be fixed!
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 01:54:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030305065419.GA22296@think.thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C77B405ABE6D611A93A00065B3FFBBA36A531@PA-EXCH2>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:36:54PM -0800, Christopher Li wrote:
> I post a patch for comment on ext2-devel for the
> NFS cookie bug. Did not get any feedback yet.
> As Ted suggested, it set the cookie to -1 on EOF,
> even though it is not seek able to there.
The patch was almost good enough. The problem with your simple
version was that on the subsequent call to ext3_dx_readdir, the -1 got
translated to a hash value of fffffffe, and if you were unlucky enough
to have a file whose hash was 0xfffffffe, you'd still end up looping
forever.
See the patch which I just sent to ext2-devel and LKML, which I think
solves both this problem and the conversion-to-htree-while-doing-NFS-readdir
problem. What I did was to treated f_pos==-1 as an explicit EOF cookie,
instead of letting it get translated into large hash value. I also explicitly
returned a next_hash value of ~0 when there was no more leaf pages, which
then got immediately translated into a f_pos value of -1. This saves an
extra call to ext3_htree_fill_tree(), a minor optimization.
- Ted
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-05 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-05 2:36 [Ext2-devel] Re: ext3 htree brelse problems look to be fixed! Christopher Li
2003-03-05 6:54 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030305065419.GA22296@think.thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
--cc=cloos@jhcloos.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ext3-users@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox