public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:28:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030307112840.4591cc68.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030307175700.GA2835@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:57:01 -0800 Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote:

| WimMark I report for 2.5.64-mm1
| 
| Runs with anticipatory scheduler:  547.28 580.69
| Runs with deadline scheduler:  1557.79 1360.52
| 
| 	WimMark I is a rough benchmark we have been running
| here at Oracle against various kernels.  Each run tests an OLTP
| workload on the Oracle database with somewhat restrictive memory
| conditions.  This reduces in-memory buffering of data, allowing for
| more I/O.  The I/O is read and sync write, random and seek-laden.
| 	The benchmark is called "WimMark I" because it has no
| official standing and is only a relative benchmark useful for comparing
| kernel changes.  The benchmark is normalized an arbitrary kernel, which
| scores 1000.0.  All other numbers are relative to this.
| 	The machine in question is a 4 way 700 MHz Xeon machine with 2GB
| of RAM.  CONFIG_HIGHMEM4GB is selected.  The disk accessed for data is a
| 10K RPM U2W SCSI of similar vintage.  Unless mentioned, all runs are
| on this machine (variation in hardware would indeed change the
| benchmark).

Is there a web page where we can view/compare results?

Thanks,
--
~Randy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-07 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-07 17:57 WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1 Joel Becker
2003-03-07 18:06 ` Alex Riesen
2003-03-07 19:17   ` Joel Becker
2003-03-07 18:43 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-07 19:19   ` Joel Becker
2003-03-07 19:28 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2003-03-07 19:44   ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030307112840.4591cc68.rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox