From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: PCI driver module unload race?
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:51:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030308195117.GE26374@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030308194714.GA7340@vana.vc.cvut.cz>
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 08:47:14PM +0100, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:12:37AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:47:49AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What prevents the following scenario from happening? It's purely
> > > theoretical - I haven't seen this occuring.
> > >
> > > - Load PCI driver.
> > >
> > > - PCI driver registers using pci_module_init(), and adds itself to sysfs.
> > >
> > > - Hot-plugin a PCI device which uses this driver. sysfs matches the PCI
> > > driver, and calls the PCI drivers probe function.
> >
> > Ugh, yes you are correct, I can't believe I missed this before.
> >
> > How does this patch look?
>
> Bad...
>
> What are you trying to solve?
The case where while probe() is called, the module is unloaded.
Same thing for remove().
That's all.
> After driver calls pci_unregister_driver,
> it is sure that there are no other users of this pci driver.
Sure, but that's not the case of what we are protecting here. We want
pci_unregister_driver() (which is usually called from the module_exit()
function), to not be called if we are in the middle of calling either
probe() or release().
Do you have a way of protecting the race that is described by Russell
here that differs from my patch?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-08 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-08 10:47 PCI driver module unload race? Russell King
2003-03-08 19:12 ` Greg KH
2003-03-08 19:47 ` Petr Vandrovec
2003-03-08 19:51 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-03-09 2:33 ` Petr Vandrovec
2003-03-08 20:03 ` Russell King
2003-03-08 20:09 ` Russell King
2003-03-08 20:21 ` Greg KH
2003-03-10 21:44 ` Greg KH
2003-03-10 23:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-03-10 23:51 ` Greg KH
2003-03-11 1:04 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-11 1:15 ` Greg KH
2003-03-11 9:00 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-03-11 15:06 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-11 16:07 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-03-16 13:13 ` Rusty Russell
2003-03-11 11:05 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-11 15:27 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-11 20:09 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-11 19:15 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-03-12 2:28 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-16 13:05 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030308195117.GE26374@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox