Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2

Roman Zippel
2003-03-07T18:27:13Z

Hi,

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> > You are avoiding my question. If something goes into the kernel, the
> > kernel license would be the obvious choice. Granting additional rights or
> > using a dual license is a relatively small problem. But you must certainly
> > have a reason to choose a completely different license?
>
> I gave my reason. You chose not to accept it, but that's not my problem.

Could you please repeat your reasoning? I must have missed something.
So far I'm still trying to understand your choice and I haven't rejected
or accepted anything yet. So far I also tried to be careful not to give
any judgement, you're interpreting something into my words, I didn't
intend to say.

bye, Roman